From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: kirkland@canonical.com, ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xatrix101@gmail.com
Subject: Re: ecryptfs lock loop
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:40:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E5FFD3.6090309@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E4E5A4.80109@gmail.com>
Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one student (in CC) found out a suspicioous locking dependence in
> ecryptfs code while debugging/running a static lockdep analyzer.
>
> I'm unable to say whether it is only a theoretical issue or a real bug,
> any ideas?
Hi Jiri - This looks to be a real bug. Thanks for pointing it out!
>
> Here it comes:
>
> function ecryptfs_send_message:
> ------------------------------
> ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux <- ecryptfs_msg_ctx_lists_mux
> (in function ecryptfs_send_message_locked)
It would be nice if we could keep from having to hold the
ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux for the entire execution of
ecryptfs_send_message_locked(). Maybe we could just hold it in
ecryptfs_send_message(), while it calls ecryptfs_find_daemon_by_euid().
I think we would need to grab the daemon->mux before releasing the
ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux to make sure that a QUIT message wasn't
received and the daemon freed before we add the msg_ctx to the
daemon->msg_ctx_out_queue in ecryptfs_send_miscdev().
It would remove the first lock dependency you pointed out, but I'll need
some more time to determine if it creates another bad lock loop. Thanks
again!
Tyler
>
> function ecryptfs_wait_for_response:
> -----------------------------------
> cryptfs_msg_ctx_lists_mux <- msg_ctx->mux
>
> function ecryptfs_process_response:
> ----------------------------------
> msg_ctx->mux <- ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux
>
>
> <- means lock dependency
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-15 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-14 19:36 ecryptfs lock loop Jiri Slaby
2009-04-15 15:40 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E5FFD3.6090309@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=kirkland@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xatrix101@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox