From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Linux USB kernel mailing list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: USB storage no-boot regression (bisected)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:49:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E60219.9080103@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0904151146210.3072-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>> Why should every user suffer a slower boot and a poorer resume time ?
>>
>> Instead make the root fs mounting look like this
>>
>>
>> while(my_rootfs_hasnt_appeared_and_i_am_sad()) {
>> wait_on(&new_disk_discovery);
>> }
>>
>> and poke the queue whenever we add a relevant device.
>>
>> That way if you are booting off an initrd you can finish the SATA probe
>> in parallel to getting userspace ticking over.
>>
>> On what is nowdays essentially a hot plug system it all needs turning
>> this way up - eg RAID volumes should assemble and come online as the
>> drives are discovered not at some fixed point later in userspace.
>
> Indeed, something like this should also be used for
> resume-from-hibernation, to wait for the swap device.
..
It just needs a way to set a finite timeout, so that server room
equipment can auto-panic-reboot and try again if a device has died.
-ml
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-15 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-14 21:06 USB storage no-boot regression (bisected) Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15 1:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 2:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15 2:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 2:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15 3:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 8:40 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-15 1:49 ` Greg KH
2009-04-15 2:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15 2:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 5:09 ` Greg KH
2009-04-15 13:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15 14:25 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-15 14:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 15:37 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-15 19:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 21:55 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-16 1:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-16 2:14 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-16 2:54 ` Greg KH
2009-04-16 10:51 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-16 13:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-16 13:49 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-16 2:17 ` Hal Murray
2009-04-16 3:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15 15:01 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-15 15:47 ` Alan Stern
2009-04-15 15:49 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2009-04-15 17:06 ` VomLehn
2009-04-15 17:32 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-15 20:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 20:20 ` VomLehn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E60219.9080103@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox