From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: simplify I/O stat accounting
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:03:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E837EC.5000202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090416164253.GU5178@kernel.dk>
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Jerome Marchand wrote:
>>>>> This simplifies I/O stat accounting switching code and separates it
>>>>> completely from I/O scheduler switch code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Requests are accounted according to the state of their request queue
>>>>> at the time of the request allocation. There is no need anymore to
>>>>> flush the request queue when switching I/O accounting state.
>>>> This is cleaner, I like it. I'll apply it, but I'm changing this one:
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -792,9 +792,10 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct
>>>>> request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
>>>>> if (priv)
>>>>> rl->elvpriv++;
>>>>>
>>>>> + iostat = blk_queue_io_stat(q) ? REQ_IO_STAT : 0;
>>>>> spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>>>> to a regular if, I hate these ?: constructs. An if is much more
>>>> readable, imho.
>>> Grmbl, your patch is line wrapped. Please fix your mailer.
>> And it doesn't apply to current -git. Looks like a hand apply, but
>> please be a little more careful in the future.
>
> OK, it doesn't even compile either:
>
> +#define blk_rq_io_stat(rq) ((rq)->flags & REQ_IO_STAT)
>
> that wants to be ->cmd_flags.
>
> Please resend when you have something that at least compiles. If you
> send untested stuff my way, at least tell me.
>
Hi Jens,
I'm very sorry about this. I didn't send you a patch which does not
compiles on purpose. I was working on backporting that patch on an older
version of the kernel. It looks like I hand-edited that patch by mistake
before I sent it to you.
Jérôme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-17 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 13:14 [PATCH] block: simplify I/O stat accounting Jerome Marchand
2009-04-16 16:34 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-16 16:37 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-16 16:38 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-16 16:42 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-17 8:03 ` Jerome Marchand [this message]
2009-04-17 11:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Jerome Marchand
2009-04-17 11:37 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-17 11:54 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-17 12:24 ` Jerome Marchand
2009-04-17 12:30 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-21 13:32 ` [PATCH v3] " Jerome Marchand
2009-04-22 12:16 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E837EC.5000202@redhat.com \
--to=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox