From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755979AbZDUB2L (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:28:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752969AbZDUB14 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:27:56 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:53868 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752238AbZDUB1z (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:27:55 -0400 Message-ID: <49ED2088.9090703@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:25:28 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Tim Abbott , Linux kernel mailing list , Anders Kaseorg , Waseem Daher , Denys Vlasenko , Rusty Russell , Andi Kleen , Stephen Rothwell , Jeff Arnold , Andrew Morton , Jon Masters Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for compiling with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections References: <1238973278-31735-1-git-send-email-tabbott@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Are there any advantages outside of the size things? > > Do we end up packing data better? > > I'd like to have some more champions of this code, in other words. > > I'd be ok with merging it, but I haven't really gotten a strong feeling > that anybody is going to enable it or use it. > It may be a long haul to get people to actually use it, but there is a fairly major advantage near the end, and that is that we can structure the source code in a way that makes sense for reading it, rather than what will end up using what. Assuming it does work correctly. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.