From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757757AbZDWLP1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:15:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751948AbZDWLPO (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:15:14 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:54191 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754769AbZDWLPN (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:15:13 -0400 Message-ID: <49F04D7C.2040807@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:14:04 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Axboe CC: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] block bits for 2.6.30-rc3 References: <20090423103523.GT4593@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <20090423103523.GT4593@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (1): > block: enable by default support for large devices and files on 32-bit archs Although I strongly support this change -- is this really appropriate for -rc3? I know it's only a one-line Kconfig change, but still... this does not seem to fall into the category of "regression fix." Jeff