From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>, Brice Goglin <brice@myri.com>
Subject: IRQ / SoftIRQ CPU time accounting broken by 457533a7d3402d1d91fbc125c8bd1bd16dcd3cd4
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:19:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F078FA.6010507@myri.com> (raw)
When running netperf for some 10GbE tests, I noticed
that IRQ and SOFTIRQ CPU time is no longer reported for an
otherwise idle CPU on recent kernels, at least for x86_64.
If I take a 2-CPU system, and bind the NIC IRQ to CPU0, and
bind the user-space netserver daemon to CPU1, the problem
is obvious when blasting 10Gb/s of traffic at it. I see
no CPU used for irq or softirq on CPU0, even though it is
handling 13K interrupts/sec:
% mpstat -P 0 1
Linux 2.6.30-rc1 (venice) 04/22/09
11:25:25 CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %irq %soft %idle
intr/s
11:25:26 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
13248.00
11:25:27 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
13280.00
Common sense tells me that is wrong, and oprofile verifies there is
a lot happening on CPU0. Further, when I run a cpu-soaker in
usermode bound to CPU0, I start to see irq, softirq, etc,
being correctly identified:
11:28:02 CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %irq %soft %idle
intr/s
11:28:03 0 45.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.96 52.94 0.00
13019.61
11:28:04 0 46.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 51.52 0.00
13414.14
The problem is observable, but much less obvious when using a more
common, e1000 1GbE NIC (15% softirq is missing, rather than 50%).
I spent a few hours git-bisecting until I finally got here:
% git-bisect bad
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
[457533a7d3402d1d91fbc125c8bd1bd16dcd3cd4] fix scaled & unscaled cputime
accounting
I have neither CONFIG_NO_HZ, CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING, or XEN configured.
Drew
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-23 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-23 14:19 Andrew Gallatin [this message]
2009-04-28 23:30 ` IRQ / SoftIRQ CPU time accounting broken by 457533a7d3402d1d91fbc125c8bd1bd16dcd3cd4 Andrew Morton
2009-04-29 5:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29 7:46 ` [PATCH] sched: account system time properly Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29 8:08 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-29 9:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29 9:48 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-29 10:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 12:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29 13:09 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29 14:58 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-29 19:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 13:23 ` [PATCH] " Andrew Gallatin
2009-04-29 8:02 ` IRQ / SoftIRQ CPU time accounting broken by 457533a7d3402d1d91fbc125c8bd1bd16dcd3cd4 Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F078FA.6010507@myri.com \
--to=gallatin@myri.com \
--cc=brice@myri.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox