From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754243AbZD0Jge@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754243AbZD0Jge (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:36:34 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753189AbZD0JgZ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:36:25 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f158.google.com ([209.85.220.158]:33312 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f158.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752706AbZD0JgY (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:36:24 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=UPB1j/EiHU6RAdyCm0ql9QGWdiCHCzN6wh/zScnVd7sSD4pnue5H1r64liy09dqKkd
         kXVD6TPLorggRd/L0lrA+l882nRqysg2cniv2QzyESD0hpQdHUbT61e/p5aEoTj96d04
         QErBZ1r82hFuW2ClFT92i0YeTFhNQ/2RWTm44=
Message-ID: <49F57C8C.4010105@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:36:12 +0200
From: Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090310)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "linux.kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since  2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
References: <cvbEH-2YF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <cvbOn-3b0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <cviZC-6ap-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In-Reply-To: <cviZC-6ap-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 04/26/2009 10:20 PM, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki [Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:46:25AM +0200]:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
> 
> Sure, still broken. For some version it works, for most newer not,
> as reported.
> 
> Can we stop that nag-service and spent time in fixing it better?

You should rather be quiet about the time people are investing in this
community, especially when others strongly differ from you the merit of
that service.

Without Rafael's reports some of the regressions I have posted probably
would have not been investigated at all.

Niel
--