public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@petalogix.com>
To: monstr@monstr.eu
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Memory limits - mm_segment_t - MAKE_MM_SEG
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:03:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F85E24.5050801@petalogix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F85C27.9000308@monstr.eu>

Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I look at some things which I need to clear for MMU Microblaze patches and
> I would like to know your opinion about.
>
> First of all I found that almost all archs use MAKE_MM_SEG macro which should be good
> to move to generic location (asm-generic/uaccess.h ? )
> #define MAKE_MM_SEG(s) ((mm_segment_t) { (s) })
>
>
> The second thing is about place where is stored limit for processes -> mm_segment_t structure
>
> Where is the proper location for storing mm_segment_t? Some arch use thread_info some of them
> thread_struct
>
> For microblaze case are used both -> that's definitely not correct.
>
> Here is the small table for cpus which are in linux kernel and location and type for them.
> The most of them uses thread_info structure for it and name is addr_limit.
> The location of mm_segment_t is different too -> we should move it to any generic location too.
> What do you think?
>
>         location                     name           location      struct mm_segment_t
> s390:   processor.h/thread_struct    mm_segment     processor.h   __u32 ar4
> alpha:  thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     processor.h  unsigned long seg
> x86:    thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     processor.h  unsigned long seg
> ia64:   thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     processor.h  unsigned long seg
> mips:   thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     processor.h  unsigned long seg
> um:     thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     uaccess.h    unsigned long seg
> frv:    thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     segment.h    unsigned long seg
> cris:   thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     segment.h    unsigned long seg
> sh:     thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     segment.h    unsigned long seg
> h8300:  not_used     not_used                       segment.h    unsigned long seg
> nm10300:thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     processor.h  unsigned long seg
> arm:    thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     thread_info.h  typedef unsigned long mm_segment_t;
> parisc: thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     processor.h  int seq
> m32r:   thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     processor.h  unsigned long seg
> xtensa: thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit     segment.h    unsigned long seg
> avr32:  not_used     not_used                       uaccess.h    unsigned int is_user_space;
> sparc:  processor_32.h/thread_struct  current_ds    processor_32.h  int seg
> m68k:   not_used     not_used                       segment.h    unsigned long seg
> blackfin:thread_info.h/thread_info    addr_limit    thread_info.h  typedef unsigned long mm_segment_t;
> powerpc: processor.h/thread_struct  current_ds     processor.h  unsigned long seg
>
>
> There is really mess in it and I would like to have good solution for Microblaze and I think
> that will be good to have any generic solution and remove code duplication.
>
> Thanks for your comments,
> Michal
>
>   
+ move some macros to generic location too.
#define get_ds()      (KERNEL_DS)

+ get_fs(), set_fs(), segment_eq() after sync changes above

Michal





-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-29 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-29 13:54 Memory limits - mm_segment_t - MAKE_MM_SEG Michal Simek
2009-04-29 14:03 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2009-04-30 13:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-04-30 14:28   ` Michal Simek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49F85E24.5050801@petalogix.com \
    --to=michal.simek@petalogix.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=john.williams@petalogix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox