From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762091AbZEASTt (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2009 14:19:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754417AbZEASTj (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2009 14:19:39 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([81.13.33.159]:37688 "EHLO isrv.corpit.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754147AbZEASTi (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2009 14:19:38 -0400 Message-ID: <49FB3D37.5060509@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 22:19:35 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Kleikamp CC: Christoph Hellwig , Ogawa Hirofumi , Andrew Tridgell , Steve French , Mingming Cao , Paul McKenney , LKML , linux-fsdevel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option References: <1241199689.13073.6.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> <20090501174757.GC8104@infradead.org> <1241201562.13073.30.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1241201562.13073.30.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 13:47 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 12:41:29PM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote: >>> From: Andrew Tridgell >>> Subject: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option >>> >>> When this option is enabled the VFAT filesystem will refuse to create >>> new files with long names. Accessing existing files with long names >>> will continue to work. >>> >>> File names to be created must conform to the 8.3 format. Mixed case is >>> not allowed in either the prefix or the suffix. >> This doesn't make any sense as a compile time option. Might make sense >> as a mount option, but I'd like to hear a rationale for it first. > > Some linux-based devices would be happy not to contain code to create > the long name at all. Well, is that a rationale per se? Which devices they are and why? But besides, why `msdos' filesystem is not sufficient? It contains no code to create long file names and no code to read such names either. /mjt