From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760988AbZEBWKj (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 18:10:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754895AbZEBWKb (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 18:10:31 -0400 Received: from ns2.uludag.org.tr ([193.140.100.220]:38395 "EHLO pardus.org.tr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754101AbZEBWKa (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 18:10:30 -0400 Message-ID: <49FCC4D8.7050409@pardus.org.tr> Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 01:10:32 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?T3phbiDDh2HEn2xheWFu?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.28.10 References: <20090502200413.GA7287@kroah.com> <49FCBF1C.1060603@pardus.org.tr> <20090502215011.GA17424@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20090502215011.GA17424@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > "Policy"? heh, no :) > > It has been repeated many times that the 2.6.27 tree is going to be > maintained for a long time. That is why I am still doing .27 releases, > and will be for quite a while. > > The other -stable branches are moving just like they always have been, > nothing is new there. > > Hope this helps, > Yep it helped, thanks :)