From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754637AbZEEDnq (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 23:43:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757178AbZEEDn1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 23:43:27 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:52543 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756160AbZEEDnZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 23:43:25 -0400 Message-ID: <49FFB598.4090205@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 12:42:16 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Shtylyov CC: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, bzolnier@gmail.com, petkovbb@googlemail.com, mike.miller@hp.com, Eric.Moore@lsi.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, zaitcev@redhat.com, Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, paul.clements@steeleye.com, tim@cyberelk.net, jeremy@xensource.com, adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk, oakad@yahoo.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ballabio_dario@emc.com, davem@davemloft.net, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com, bharrosh@panasas.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] block: implement blk_rq_pos/[cur_]sectors() and convert obvious ones References: <1241423927-11871-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1241423927-11871-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <49FEF174.6040505@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <49FEF174.6040505@ru.mvista.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 05 May 2009 03:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Tejun Heo wrote: > >> Implement accessors - blk_rq_pos(), blk_rq_sectors() and >> blk_rq_cur_sectors() which return rq->sector, rq->hard_nr_sectors and > > Well, blk_rq_pos() returns rq->hard_sector, not rq->sector, doesn't it? Right, description updated. Thanks. -- tejun