RE: [PATCH 2/2] lib/string.c: Optimize memchr()

[David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>]

From: Yu-Jen Chang
> Sent: 12 July 2022 15:59
...
> > I think you're missing the point. Loads at unaligned addresses may not
> > be allowed by hardware using conventional load instructions or may be
> > inefficient. Given that this memchr implementation is used as a fallback
> > when no hardware-specific version is available, you should be
> > conservative wrt. hardware capabilities and behavior. You should
> > probably have a pre-alignment loop.
> 
> Got it. I add  pre-alignment loop. It aligns the address to 8 or 4bytes.

That should be predicated on !HAS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.

...
>         for (; p <= end - 8; p += 8) {
>             val = *(u64*)p ^ mask;
>             if ((val + 0xfefefefefefefeffull)
> & (~val & 0x8080808080808080ull))
>                 break;

I would add a couple of comments, like:
	// Convert to check for zero byte.
	// Standard check for a zero byte in a word.
(But not the big 4 line explanation you had.

It is also worth looking at how that code compiles
on 32bit arch that don't have a carry flag.
That is everything based on MIPS, including riscv.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)