* [PATCH 1/1] ftrace: fix typo in ftrace.txt file
@ 2009-05-20 1:41 GeunSik Lim
2009-05-20 2:00 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: GeunSik Lim @ 2009-05-20 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, linux-rt-users, linux-kernel,
tglx, williams
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2028 bytes --]
commit 43bf3fdddfd6b0ac65ef59bec3c79d9f9064e8bd
Author: GeunSik,Lim <leemgs1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu May 14 13:39:18 2009 +0900
ftrace: fix typo in ftrace.txt file.
Fix typo about chart to map the kernel priority to
user land priorities.
About sched_setscheduler(2)
Processes scheduled under SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR
can have a static priority in the range 1 to 99.
Signed-off-by: GeunSik Lim <geunsik.lim@samsung.com>
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
index fd9a3e6..0e17632 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
+++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
@@ -518,9 +518,14 @@ priority with zero (0) being the highest priority and the nice
values starting at 100 (nice -20). Below is a quick chart to map
the kernel priority to user land priorities.
- Kernel priority: 0 to 99 ==> user RT priority 99 to 0
- Kernel priority: 100 to 139 ==> user nice -20 to 19
- Kernel priority: 140 ==> idle task priority
+ Kernel priority: 0(high) to 99(low) ==> user RT priority 99(high) to 1(low)
+ Kernel priority: 100(high) to 139(low) ==> user nice -20(high) to 19(low)
+ Kernel priority: 140 ==> idle task priority
+
+Processes scheduled with SCHED_OTHER or SCHED_BATCH must be assigned
+the static priority 0. Processes scheduled under SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR
+can have a static priority in the range 1 to 99.
+ (reference: $> man 2 sched_setscheduler)
The task states are:
-----------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-***"
in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
GeunSik Lim (ELS - OS Group - S/W Lab - SAIT - SAMSUNG)
e-Mail :1) geunsik.lim@samsung.com
2) leemgs@gmail.com , leemgs1@gmail.com
HomePage: http://intomail.dnip.net/invain/me/
-----------------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: fix-typo-chart-map-priority-ftrace.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1500 bytes --]
commit 43bf3fdddfd6b0ac65ef59bec3c79d9f9064e8bd
Author: GeunSik,Lim <leemgs1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu May 14 13:39:18 2009 +0900
ftrace: fix typo in ftrace.txt file.
Fix typo about chart to map the kernel priority to
user land priorities.
About sched_setscheduler(2)
Processes scheduled under SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR
can have a static priority in the range 1 to 99.
Signed-off-by: GeunSik Lim <geunsik.lim@samsung.com>
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
index fd9a3e6..0e17632 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
+++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
@@ -518,9 +518,14 @@ priority with zero (0) being the highest priority and the nice
values starting at 100 (nice -20). Below is a quick chart to map
the kernel priority to user land priorities.
- Kernel priority: 0 to 99 ==> user RT priority 99 to 0
- Kernel priority: 100 to 139 ==> user nice -20 to 19
- Kernel priority: 140 ==> idle task priority
+ Kernel priority: 0(high) to 99(low) ==> user RT priority 99(high) to 1(low)
+ Kernel priority: 100(high) to 139(low) ==> user nice -20(high) to 19(low)
+ Kernel priority: 140 ==> idle task priority
+
+Processes scheduled with SCHED_OTHER or SCHED_BATCH must be assigned
+the static priority 0. Processes scheduled under SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR
+can have a static priority in the range 1 to 99.
+ (reference: $> man 2 sched_setscheduler)
The task states are:
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ftrace: fix typo in ftrace.txt file
2009-05-20 1:41 [PATCH 1/1] ftrace: fix typo in ftrace.txt file GeunSik Lim
@ 2009-05-20 2:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-20 4:40 ` GeunSik Lim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2009-05-20 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GeunSik Lim
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, linux-rt-users, linux-kernel, tglx,
williams
On Wed, 20 May 2009, GeunSik Lim wrote:
>
>
> commit 43bf3fdddfd6b0ac65ef59bec3c79d9f9064e8bd
> Author: GeunSik,Lim <leemgs1@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu May 14 13:39:18 2009 +0900
>
> ftrace: fix typo in ftrace.txt file.
>
> Fix typo about chart to map the kernel priority to
> user land priorities.
>
> About sched_setscheduler(2)
> Processes scheduled under SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR
> can have a static priority in the range 1 to 99.
>
> Signed-off-by: GeunSik Lim <geunsik.lim@samsung.com>
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
> index fd9a3e6..0e17632 100644
> --- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
> @@ -518,9 +518,14 @@ priority with zero (0) being the highest priority and the nice
> values starting at 100 (nice -20). Below is a quick chart to map
> the kernel priority to user land priorities.
>
> - Kernel priority: 0 to 99 ==> user RT priority 99 to 0
> - Kernel priority: 100 to 139 ==> user nice -20 to 19
> - Kernel priority: 140 ==> idle task priority
> + Kernel priority: 0(high) to 99(low) ==> user RT priority 99(high) to 1(low)
Shouldn't that be:
Kernel priority: 0(high) to 98(low) ==> user RT priority 99(high) to 1(low)
100 items does not map to 99. Which begs the question, what can have
internal kernel priority 99?
> + Kernel priority: 100(high) to 139(low) ==> user nice -20(high) to 19(low)
> + Kernel priority: 140 ==> idle task priority
> +
> +Processes scheduled with SCHED_OTHER or SCHED_BATCH must be assigned
> +the static priority 0. Processes scheduled under SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR
This line is confusing. "static priorty 0" really has no meaning here.
Those now enter the "nice" priorities, and this statement does not
represent what is shown in the ftrace output.
> +can have a static priority in the range 1 to 99.
> + (reference: $> man 2 sched_setscheduler)
>
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ftrace: fix typo in ftrace.txt file
2009-05-20 2:00 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2009-05-20 4:40 ` GeunSik Lim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: GeunSik Lim @ 2009-05-20 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, linux-rt-users, linux-kernel, tglx,
williams
2009/5/20 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>:
>
> On Wed, 20 May 2009, GeunSik Lim wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> commit 43bf3fdddfd6b0ac65ef59bec3c79d9f9064e8bd
>> Author: GeunSik,Lim <leemgs1@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu May 14 13:39:18 2009 +0900
>>
>> ftrace: fix typo in ftrace.txt file.
>>
>> Fix typo about chart to map the kernel priority to
>> user land priorities.
>>
>> About sched_setscheduler(2)
>> Processes scheduled under SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR
>> can have a static priority in the range 1 to 99.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: GeunSik Lim <geunsik.lim@samsung.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
>> index fd9a3e6..0e17632 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
>> @@ -518,9 +518,14 @@ priority with zero (0) being the highest priority and the nice
>> values starting at 100 (nice -20). Below is a quick chart to map
>> the kernel priority to user land priorities.
>>
>> - Kernel priority: 0 to 99 ==> user RT priority 99 to 0
>> - Kernel priority: 100 to 139 ==> user nice -20 to 19
>> - Kernel priority: 140 ==> idle task priority
>> + Kernel priority: 0(high) to 99(low) ==> user RT priority 99(high) to 1(low)
>
> Shouldn't that be:
>
> Kernel priority: 0(high) to 98(low) ==> user RT priority 99(high) to 1(low)
>
Thank you for your opinion. I think about corrected expression for
quick chart to map between kernel space and user space in ftrace .
> 100 items does not map to 99. Which begs the question, what can have
> internal kernel priority 99?
>
ok. Below example is about kernel (static) priority 99 that you said.
please, refer to
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/sched_setscheduler.2.html
webpage.
For processes scheduled under one of the normal scheduling policies
(SCHED_OTHER, SCHED_IDLE, SCHED_BATCH), sched_priority is not used in
scheduling decisions (it must be specified as 0).
int main (int argc, char **argv)
{ int pidnumber, ret;
struct sched_param p;
p.sched_priority = 0; <------ Kernel (static) priority.
if (argc != 2) {
printf("usage: setbatch <pid>\n");
exit(-1);
}
pidnumber = atol(argv[1]);
/* 3 = Number of SCHED_BATCH Constant */
ret = sched_setscheduler(pidnumber, 3, &p);
if (ret) {
printf("could not set pid %d to SCHED_BATCH: err %d.\n", pid, ret);
return -1;
}
printf("pid %d is SCHED_BATCH from now on.\n", pid);
return 0;
}
>> + Kernel priority: 100(high) to 139(low) ==> user nice -20(high) to 19(low)
>> + Kernel priority: 140 ==> idle task priority
>> +
>> +Processes scheduled with SCHED_OTHER or SCHED_BATCH must be assigned
>> +the static priority 0. Processes scheduled under SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR
>
> This line is confusing. "static priorty 0" really has no meaning here.
> Those now enter the "nice" priorities, and this statement does not
> represent what is shown in the ftrace output.
>
I agree with your opinion about exact understanding of ftrace output.
I will remove this additional description to avoid confusing
when we use this document as ftrace how to.
>> +can have a static priority in the range 1 to 99.
>> + (reference: $> man 2 sched_setscheduler)
>>
>
> -- Steve
>
>
--
Regards,
GeunSik Lim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-20 4:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-20 1:41 [PATCH 1/1] ftrace: fix typo in ftrace.txt file GeunSik Lim
2009-05-20 2:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-20 4:40 ` GeunSik Lim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).