public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: akataria@vmware.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Reduce the default HZ value
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 14:21:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A00ADDE.9000908@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241462661.412.8.camel@alok-dev1>

Alok Kataria wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Given that there were no major objections that came up regarding
> reducing the HZ value in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/27/499. 
> 
> Below is the patch which actually reduces it, please consider for tip.
> 

What is the benefit of this?

I can see at least one immediate downside: some timeout values in the 
kernel are still maintained in units of HZ (like poll, I believe), and 
so with a lower HZ value we'll have higher roundoff errors.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-05 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-04 18:44 [PATCH] x86: Reduce the default HZ value Alok Kataria
2009-05-05 21:21 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-05-05 21:44   ` Alan Cox
2009-05-05 22:09     ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-05 22:33       ` Alan Cox
2009-05-05 23:37         ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-07 14:09         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 15:12           ` Alan Cox
2009-05-05 21:57   ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-07 14:13     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 15:14       ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 15:20         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 15:30         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-07 15:40           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 16:55           ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-07 17:09             ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 17:55               ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-07 19:51                 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 20:03                   ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-07 20:30                     ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 16:37         ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-07 17:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:20             ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:39               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:40                 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:54               ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-07 17:51                 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 19:51                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-07 17:36             ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-07 17:38               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 18:01                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-07 18:12                   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 19:06                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-07 19:53                     ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 19:56                       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 20:24                         ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 20:21                           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-08 10:32                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-08 12:50                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-08 14:16                       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-08 15:06                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-07 17:18           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:37             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:34               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:55                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:55                   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:19         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:45           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:50             ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 19:17               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 19:38                 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 21:01             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-07 16:35     ` Chris Snook
2009-05-07 16:56       ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-07 20:29         ` Chris Snook
2009-05-07 20:34           ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 22:16             ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-05-07 22:19             ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-08  9:31               ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-12 19:45 devzero
2009-05-13 23:30 ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-14 20:25 devzero
2009-05-14 20:29 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A00ADDE.9000908@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=akataria@vmware.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox