* [PATCH] block: fix the bio_vec array index out-of-bounds test
@ 2009-05-08 6:45 Kazuhisa Ichikawa
2009-05-12 11:27 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kazuhisa Ichikawa @ 2009-05-08 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: linux-kernel
From: Kazuhisa Ichikawa <ki@epsilou.com>
Current bio_vec array index out-of-bounds test within
__end_that_request_first() does not seem correct.
It checks bio->bi_idx against bio->bi_vcnt, but the subsequent code
uses idx (which is, bio->bi_idx + next_idx) as the array index into
bio_vec array. This means that the test really make sense only at
the first iteration of !(nr_bytes >=bio->bi_size) case (when next_idx
== zero). Fix this by replacing bio->bi_idx with idx.
(This patch applies to 2.6.30-rc4.)
Signed-off-by: Kazuhisa Ichikawa <ki@epsilou.com>
---
--- linux-2.6.30-rc4/block/blk-core.c.ORIG 2009-05-08 00:00:10.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.30-rc4/block/blk-core.c 2009-05-08 00:00:10.000000000 +0900
@@ -1768,10 +1768,10 @@ static int __end_that_request_first(stru
} else {
int idx = bio->bi_idx + next_idx;
- if (unlikely(bio->bi_idx >= bio->bi_vcnt)) {
+ if (unlikely(idx >= bio->bi_vcnt)) {
blk_dump_rq_flags(req, "__end_that");
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bio idx %d >= vcnt %d\n",
- __func__, bio->bi_idx, bio->bi_vcnt);
+ __func__, idx, bio->bi_vcnt);
break;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] block: fix the bio_vec array index out-of-bounds test
2009-05-08 6:45 [PATCH] block: fix the bio_vec array index out-of-bounds test Kazuhisa Ichikawa
@ 2009-05-12 11:27 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2009-05-12 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kazuhisa Ichikawa; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, May 08 2009, Kazuhisa Ichikawa wrote:
> From: Kazuhisa Ichikawa <ki@epsilou.com>
>
> Current bio_vec array index out-of-bounds test within
> __end_that_request_first() does not seem correct.
> It checks bio->bi_idx against bio->bi_vcnt, but the subsequent code
> uses idx (which is, bio->bi_idx + next_idx) as the array index into
> bio_vec array. This means that the test really make sense only at
> the first iteration of !(nr_bytes >=bio->bi_size) case (when next_idx
> == zero). Fix this by replacing bio->bi_idx with idx.
> (This patch applies to 2.6.30-rc4.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kazuhisa Ichikawa <ki@epsilou.com>
> ---
>
> --- linux-2.6.30-rc4/block/blk-core.c.ORIG 2009-05-08 00:00:10.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.30-rc4/block/blk-core.c 2009-05-08 00:00:10.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1768,10 +1768,10 @@ static int __end_that_request_first(stru
> } else {
> int idx = bio->bi_idx + next_idx;
>
> - if (unlikely(bio->bi_idx >= bio->bi_vcnt)) {
> + if (unlikely(idx >= bio->bi_vcnt)) {
> blk_dump_rq_flags(req, "__end_that");
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bio idx %d >= vcnt %d\n",
> - __func__, bio->bi_idx, bio->bi_vcnt);
> + __func__, idx, bio->bi_vcnt);
> break;
> }
Thanks!
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-12 11:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-08 6:45 [PATCH] block: fix the bio_vec array index out-of-bounds test Kazuhisa Ichikawa
2009-05-12 11:27 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox