From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Sanity check the e820 against the SRAT table using e820 map only
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 00:36:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A03E10C.60906@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090507142121.GL481@elte.hu>
node_cover_memory() sanity checks the SRAT table by ensuring that all
PXMs cover the memory reported in the e820. However, when calculating
the size of the holes in the e820, it uses the early_node_map[] which
contains information taken from both SRAT and e820. If the SRAT is
missing an entry, then it is not detected that the SRAT table is
incorrect and missing entries.
This patch uses the e820 map to calculate the holes instead of
early_node_map[].
comment is from Mel.
[ Impact: reject wrong SRAT tables ]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
---
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int __init nodes_cover_memory(con
pxmram = 0;
}
- e820ram = max_pfn - absent_pages_in_range(0, max_pfn);
+ e820ram = max_pfn - (e820_hole_size(0, max_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT)>>PAGE_SHIFT);
/* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow a bit of slack. */
if ((long)(e820ram - pxmram) >= 1*1024*1024) {
printk(KERN_ERR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-08 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-06 16:53 [PATCH] x86: fix nodes_cover_memory Yinghai Lu
2009-05-07 13:47 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-07 14:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 14:47 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-08 7:36 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-05-08 7:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Allow 1MB of slack between the e820 map and SRAT, not 4GB Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 9:54 ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 9:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Sanity check the e820 against the SRAT table using e820 map only Ingo Molnar
2009-05-11 15:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 9:54 ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A03E10C.60906@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox