From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755538AbZEIX1z (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2009 19:27:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753308AbZEIX1r (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2009 19:27:47 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:57419 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753263AbZEIX1q (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2009 19:27:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4A061158.3010604@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 16:27:20 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Ravnborg CC: linux arch , LKML , Tim Abbott Subject: Re: Minimal linker script References: <20090509080006.GA22617@uranus.ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20090509080006.GA22617@uranus.ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sam Ravnborg wrote: > * . = START; > * __init_begin = .; > * HEAD_SECTION > * INIT_TEXT_SECTION(PAGE_SIZE) > * INIT_DATA_SECTION(...) > * PERCPU(PAGE_SIZE) > * __init_end = .; > * > * _stext = .; > * TEXT_SECTION = 0 > * _etext = .; > * > * _sdata = .; > * RO_DATA_SECTION(PAGE_SIZE) > * RW_DATA_SECTION(...) > * _edata = .; > * > * EXCEPTION_TABLE(...) > * NOTES > * > * __bss_start = .; > * BSS_SECTION(0, 0) > * __bss_stop = .; > * _end = .; > * > * > * [__init_begin, __init_end] is the init section that may be freed after init > * [_stext, _etext] is the text section > * [_sdata, _edata] is the data section > * > * Some of the included output section include their own set of constants. > * Examples are: [__initramfs_start, __initramfs_end] for initramfs and > * [__nosave_begin, __nosave_end] for the nosave data > */ > It seems rather disturbing to me that different sections have different start and end symbols. I realize this is largely for historical reasons, but if we used a single pattern (e.g. something like __text_start, __text_end for the .text section) then at least in the i386 case we could easily recognize those as relocatable symbols even if they show up as absolute. Furthermore, consistency is a good thing, even if it means a bigger changeset. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.