Re: [PATCH -tip v5 0/7] tracing: kprobe-based event tracer and x86 instruction decoder

Masami Hiramatsu
2009-05-11T14:40:46Z

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here are the patches of kprobe-based event tracer for x86, version
>> 5, which allows you to probe various kernel events through ftrace
>> interface.
>>
>> This version supports only x86(-32/-64) (but porting it on other
>> arch just needs kprobes/kretprobes and register and stack access
>> APIs).
>>
>> This patchset also includes x86(-64) instruction decoder which
>> supports non-SSE/FP opcodes and includes x86 opcode map. I think
>> it will be possible to share this opcode map with KVM's decoder.
>>
>> This series can be applied on the latest linux-2.6-tip tree.
>>
>> This patchset includes following changes:
>> - Add x86 instruction decoder [1/7]
>> - Check insertion point safety in kprobe [2/7]
>> - Cleanup fix_riprel() with insn decoder [3/7]
>> - Add kprobe-tracer plugin [4/7]
>> - Fix kernel_trap_sp() on x86 according to systemtap runtime. [5/7]
>> - Add arch-dep register and stack fetching functions [6/7]
>> - Support fetching various status (register/stack/memory/etc.) [7/7]
>>
>> Future items:
>> - .init function tracing support.
>> - Support primitive types(long, ulong, int, uint, etc) for args.
>
> Ok, this looks pretty complete already.
>
> Two high-level comments:
>
> - There's no self-test - would it be possible to add one? See
> trace_selftest* in kernel/trace/

I'm not so sure. Currently, it seems that those self-tests are
only for tracers which define new event-entry on ring-buffer.
Since this tracer just use ftrace_bprintk, it might need
another kind of selftest. e.g. comparing outputs with
expected patterns.
In that case, would it be better to make a user-space self test
including filters and tracepoints?

> - No generic integration.

Right, this just rides on the ftrace's printk :-)

>
> It would be nice if these ops:
>
>> E.g.
>> echo p do_sys_open a0 a1 a2 a3 > /debug/tracing/kprobe_events
>>
>> This sets a kprobe on the top of do_sys_open() function with recording
>> 1st to 4th arguments.
>>
>> echo r do_sys_open rv rp >> /debug/tracing/kprobe_events
>
> were just generally available in just about any other tracer - a bit
> like the event tracer.
>
> It would also be nice to use the 'function attributes' facilities of
> the function tracer, combined with a new special syntax of the
> function-filter regex parser, to enable the recovery of return
> values (or the call arguments), for selected set of functions.
>
> For example, today we can already do things like:
>
> echo 'sys_read:traceon:4' > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
>
> for 'trace triggers': the above will trigger tracing to be enabled
> on the entry of sys_read(), 4 times.
>
> Likewise, something like:
>
> echo 'sys_read:args' > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
> echo 'sys_read:return' > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
>
> Could activate kprobes based argument and return-value tracing.

Ah, that's a good idea. And also, I have another idea for using
filters with kprobes, which is adding new kprobe-entry as a new
trace-event when user defines a new probe via kprobe_events.
Thus, user can use it as a dynamic-defined tracepoint.

Thank you,