From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] tracing: adding flags to events
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:18:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0CD0F1.5020208@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0905141535360.30591@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Christoph has been asking about processing flags in the output. He rather
> not see c2, and rather see what those three bits are. This patch is
> an RFC to do just that. To test it out, I added the previous task state to
> sched switch and used the flag processing to the printk of the
> sched_switch event.
>
>
> To add a flag, just add __print_flags to the TP_printk arguments.
>
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __field( unsigned int, flags )
> ),
>
> TP_printk("flags are %s", __print_flags(__entry->flags,
> 0, "BIT0", 1, "BIT1", 2, "BIT2", -1))
>
>
> Thus __print_flags prototype would look like:
>
> const char *__print_flags(long flags, ...);
>
How about __print_flags(long flags, char *delim, ...); ?
Take file mode for example, the output will be "rwx", but not "r|w|x".
> But it is actually converted to other helper functions to handle the
> string. The trick that ftrace does, is disables preemption before calling
> the printk, uses a percpu buffer, and passes that in to a helper function
> that will print out the flags.
>
> You could see "flags are BIT1|BIT2" if flags was 6 in the above case.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-15 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-14 19:45 [RFC] tracing: adding flags to events Steven Rostedt
2009-05-14 20:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-05-14 23:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-14 23:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-05-15 0:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-15 0:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-05-15 2:18 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2009-05-15 2:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-15 16:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0CD0F1.5020208@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox