From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755528AbZERBv2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 21:51:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751704AbZERBvT (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 21:51:19 -0400 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:44016 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751208AbZERBvS (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 21:51:18 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 554 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 21:51:18 EDT Message-ID: <4A10BCEC.3090903@goop.org> Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 18:42:04 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FUJITA Tomonori CC: mingo@elte.hu, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, gregkh@suse.de, okir@suse.de Subject: Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches? References: <4A0C770E.2030305@goop.org> <20090518103520J.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20090518103520J.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >> for-ingo/xen/dom0/pci >> for-ingo/xen/dom0/swiotlb >> >> Updated with Joerg Roedel, FUJITA Tomonori and Matthew Wilcox's >> comments, Acked-by and Reviewed-bys as appropriate. >> > > The original code added dom0-specific dma mapping stuff in the generic > place, which is completely wrong. I asked you to move the hacky stuff > to Xen-specific code and ack'ed the patchset. > > But as I said again and again, the dom0 changes to the generic dma > mapipng code is really ugly and I don't like them at all. I didn't > ack'ed such changes. > I didn't mean to imply that you all acked all the patches. I tried to be careful to add Acked tags to the actual patches you each respectively acked. J