From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: add trace_event_read_lock()
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:15:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A124080.7010400@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090519003505.GK6768@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:59:31PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 07:35:34PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>> I found that there is nothing to protect event_hash in
>>> ftrace_find_event().
>> Actually, rcu protects it, but not enough. We have neither
>> synchronize_rcu() nor rcu_read_lock.
>>
>> So we protect against concurrent hlist accesses.
>> But the event can be removed when a module is unloaded,
>> and that can happen between the time we get the event output
>> callback and the time we actually use it.
>
> I will ask the stupid question... Would invoking rcu_barrier() in the
> module-exit function take care of this? The rcu_barrier() primitive
> waits for all in-flight RCU callbacks to complete execution.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
We have no call_rcu* in it.
Thanx, Lai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-19 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-18 11:35 [PATCH] tracing: add trace_event_read_lock() Lai Jiangshan
2009-05-18 13:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-05-19 0:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-19 5:15 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2009-05-19 12:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-20 0:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-05-20 4:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-19 2:05 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-05-20 0:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-05-20 2:25 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-05-20 15:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-20 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-27 22:34 ` [tip:tracing/core] " tip-bot for Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A124080.7010400@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).