Re: [PATCH] tracing: use strlcpy instead of strncpy

[Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>]

Stefan Richter wrote:
> Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> [Impact] cleanup
> 
> Well, not entirely.
> 
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
>> @@ -155,8 +155,8 @@ struct trace_boot_ret {
>>  struct trace_branch {
>>      struct trace_entry    ent;
>>      unsigned            line;
>> -    char            func[TRACE_FUNC_SIZE+1];
>> -    char            file[TRACE_FILE_SIZE+1];
>> +    char            func[TRACE_FUNC_SIZE];
>> +    char            file[TRACE_FILE_SIZE];
>>      char            correct;
>>  };
> 
> (without change of the TRACE_????_SIZE definition)
> 
> Better avoid a categorization of a patch if the change's scope exceeds
> that of the categorization.

I think it's make no sense to change the magic number TRACE_????_SIZE,
I will rewrite my changelog as Frederic suggests.

Thank you very much.

Lai.