From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756116AbZETILg (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2009 04:11:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752811AbZETILT (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2009 04:11:19 -0400 Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.30]:57212 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752629AbZETILR (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2009 04:11:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lT9jrIg6yu+X7Z+4itCOy8GocWJYP/tW04Pfm3RejabztpznnMKAMUWAFlrQ8EArFv O6O2fanx3gOzRBJvqB8n+nSX7VVrUjsUixGNfr7/YAuCNjT6msRg78QPjECK6lXS5iGi k1x0gpU+6DaMWK3cRTX/kQn9YPdPUagAiUS7M= Message-ID: <4A13BB1D.10901@panasas.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:11:09 +0300 From: Boaz Harrosh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090315 Remi/3.0-0.b2.fc10.remi Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell , James Smart , James Bottomley CC: Tejun Heo , linux-scsi , FUJITA Tomonori , Linux Kernel , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree References: <4A12797B.2060901@panasas.com> <4A12AC23.30808@panasas.com> <20090520111619.87f815b1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20090520111619.87f815b1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/20/2009 04:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:54:59 +0300 Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> >> This patch should be squashed into >> [SCSI] FC Pass Thru support >> >> If it needs to compile after Tejun's block-layer revamps >> (all of them) > > Is there some reason that the FC passthrough support (and any followup > patches) can't be pushed through the block tree. It clearly currently > doesn't depend on anything new in the scsi tree ... > If it will go through block tree it needs James Bottomley's Ack, I guess? It does, in any case, need Ack from James Smart first. James ? Thanks Boaz