From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"JBeulich@novell.com" <JBeulich@novell.com>,
"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] x86,percpu: fix pageattr handling with remap allocator
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:08:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A149B89.3010104@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242860470.27006.10106.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hello,
Suresh Siddha wrote:
>> Hmmm... I can't really follow what you're suggesting. Can you please
>> explain it in more detailed way?
>
> Ok. Before I make another attempt walking that hill :)
Heh... the problem is that unless I understand what you're trying to
achieve (and vice-versa), our discussion is likely to be riddled with
confusions, and currently either you're misunderstanding the whole
thing or I'm being slow (not too unusual :-). It would be nice to
determine which way it is.
> I was talking to Peter and it seems there are some requests to change
> the first percpu unit allocation for each possible cpu using bootmem
> allocator, to allocating the corresponding unit at the cpu online time.
>
> Do you have plans to change this?
Yeap, once the remaining archs are converted, that's the next stop.
With recently posted patchset, only three remain - sparc64, powerpc64
and sparc64. Davem is working on sparc64. I'm planning on doing
powerpc64. ia64 is a bit tricky as it already remaps percpu areas but
I'm sure we'll find a way around it. After that, yeap, the dynamic
online thing.
> If we do this allocation during the corresponding cpu online time
> and don't end up using big pages, then also we avoid all these
> aliasing issues...
The dynamic onlining will probably use 4k pages so, yeah, it won't
have the alias issues but that's not the issue here, right? You can
already avoid aliasing that way by simply using 4k allocator from the
get-go.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-21 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-14 12:49 [GIT PATCH] x86,percpu: fix pageattr handling with remap allocator Tejun Heo
2009-05-14 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: prepare setup_pcpu_remap() for pageattr fix Tejun Heo
2009-05-14 12:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: simplify cpa_process_alias() Tejun Heo
2009-05-14 14:16 ` Jan Beulich
2009-05-14 15:37 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-14 16:20 ` [PATCH UPDATED 2/4] x86: reorganize cpa_process_alias() Tejun Heo
2009-05-14 12:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: fix pageattr handling for remap percpu allocator Tejun Heo
2009-05-14 16:21 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2009-05-14 12:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: implement percpu_alloc kernel parameter Tejun Heo
2009-05-14 14:28 ` [GIT PATCH] x86,percpu: fix pageattr handling with remap allocator Jan Beulich
2009-05-14 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-15 7:47 ` Jan Beulich
2009-05-15 8:11 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-15 8:22 ` Jan Beulich
2009-05-15 8:27 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-14 16:22 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-15 4:00 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-15 4:36 ` David Miller
2009-05-15 4:48 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-16 1:17 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-05-16 15:16 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-16 19:09 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-05-17 1:23 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-18 19:20 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-05-18 19:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-18 21:07 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-05-19 1:28 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-20 23:01 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-05-21 0:08 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-05-21 0:36 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-05-21 1:46 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-21 1:48 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-21 19:10 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-05-21 23:18 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-22 0:55 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-05-19 9:44 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-20 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-20 7:57 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A149B89.3010104@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox