From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:56:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A14D0FF.60202@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090521113902.3deb5031.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip-core tree got a conflict in
> kernel/futex.c between commit 64d1304a64477629cb16b75491a77bafe6f86963
> ("futex: setup writeable mapping for futex ops which modify user space
> data") from Linus' tree and a couple of commits from the tip-core tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below - but please check in particular, I have no idea
> if the call to get_futex_key() in futex_wait_requeue_pi() should take
> VERIFY_READ or VERIFY_WRITE).
>
> I can carry this fixup as necessary.
I suspect Thomas will be catching that up in the next day or so in tip
(or I can). If you need something now, the uaddr is VERIFY_READ and
uaddr2 is VERIFY_WRITE. See below...
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc kernel/futex.c
> index d546b2d,0c406a3..0000000
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@@ -813,13 -1092,43 +1094,43 @@@ static int futex_requeue(u32 __user *ua
> struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1, *hb2;
> struct plist_head *head1;
> struct futex_q *this, *next;
> - int ret, drop_count = 0;
> + u32 curval2;
> +
> + if (requeue_pi) {
> + /*
> + * requeue_pi requires a pi_state, try to allocate it now
> + * without any locks in case it fails.
> + */
> + if (refill_pi_state_cache())
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + /*
> + * requeue_pi must wake as many tasks as it can, up to nr_wake
> + * + nr_requeue, since it acquires the rt_mutex prior to
> + * returning to userspace, so as to not leave the rt_mutex with
> + * waiters and no owner. However, second and third wake-ups
> + * cannot be predicted as they involve race conditions with the
> + * first wake and a fault while looking up the pi_state. Both
> + * pthread_cond_signal() and pthread_cond_broadcast() should
> + * use nr_wake=1.
> + */
> + if (nr_wake != 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> retry:
> + if (pi_state != NULL) {
> + /*
> + * We will have to lookup the pi_state again, so free this one
> + * to keep the accounting correct.
> + */
> + free_pi_state(pi_state);
> + pi_state = NULL;
> + }
> +
> - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr1, fshared, &key1);
> + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr1, fshared, &key1, VERIFY_READ);
> if (unlikely(ret != 0))
> goto out;
> - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, fshared, &key2);
> + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, fshared, &key2, VERIFY_READ);
This one should be VERIFY_WRITE in the case of requeue_pi==1 as we
attempt to take this futex on behalf of the waiting task (either setting
the FUTEX_HAS_WAITERS flag or setting it as the owner). So maybe
something like:
+ ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, fshared, &key2,
requeue_pi == 1 ? VERIFY_WRITE : VERIFY_READ);
Alternatively just put it in an if/else block to avoid the inline
tertiary operator.
> + static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared,
> + u32 val, ktime_t *abs_time, u32 bitset,
> + int clockrt, u32 __user *uaddr2)
> + {
> + struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to = NULL;
> + struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter;
> + struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex = NULL;
> + DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> + struct restart_block *restart;
> + struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
> + union futex_key key2;
> + struct futex_q q;
> + int res, ret;
> + u32 uval;
> +
> + if (!bitset)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (abs_time) {
> + to = &timeout;
> + hrtimer_init_on_stack(&to->timer, clockrt ? CLOCK_REALTIME :
> + CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
> + hrtimer_init_sleeper(to, current);
> + hrtimer_set_expires_range_ns(&to->timer, *abs_time,
> + current->timer_slack_ns);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The waiter is allocated on our stack, manipulated by the requeue
> + * code while we sleep on uaddr.
> + */
> + debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter);
> + rt_waiter.task = NULL;
> +
> + q.pi_state = NULL;
> + q.bitset = bitset;
> + q.rt_waiter = &rt_waiter;
> +
> + key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
> - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, fshared, &key2);
> ++ ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, fshared, &key2, VERIFY_READ);
This one should be VERIFY_WRITE (it's the pi futex, so we set it's value
here in the kernel).
Thanks,
--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-21 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-21 1:39 linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-21 3:56 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2009-05-21 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-21 9:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-22 0:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-22 5:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-22 18:18 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A14D0FF.60202@us.ibm.com \
--to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox