Re: [KVM PATCH v10] kvm: add support for irqfd

Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-14T13:50:30Z

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:40:11PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>
>
>>> I don't want to assume that the eventfds all come from the same source.
>>>
>>> That said, we have a workaround, allocate a new gsi with the same
>>> routes and attach the excess eventfds there.
>>>
>>
>> Right. So you are ok with 1:1 irqfd:gsi requirement for now?
>> This seems nicer than N:1 with an arbitrary N
>
> Not too happy, but okay.

Is the answer 42:1 then, as usual?