From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S932184AbZE0HhJ@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932184AbZE0HhJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 27 May 2009 03:37:09 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762646AbZE0HbO
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 27 May 2009 03:31:14 -0400
Received: from gw-ca.panasas.com ([209.116.51.66]:26980 "EHLO
	laguna.int.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1762883AbZE0HbN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 27 May 2009 03:31:13 -0400
Message-ID: <4A1CEC3D.5030908@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:31:09 +0300
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
       Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
       Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
       Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13175] sata_nv incompatible with async scsi scan
References: <GtY7d2eWpoK.A.ioC.MQcGKB@chimera> <WCcYF-TAbJC.A.NgD.lQcGKB@chimera> <4A1C1B08.2080600@panasas.com> <200905262047.20823.rjw@sisk.pl>
In-Reply-To: <200905262047.20823.rjw@sisk.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 May 2009 07:31:13.0610 (UTC) FILETIME=[1D17CAA0:01C9DE9D]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On May. 26, 2009, 21:47 +0300, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> On May. 24, 2009, 22:31 +0300, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
>>>
>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>> introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should
>>> be listed and let me know (either way).
>> Verified to still exist with 2.6.30-rc7 :-(
>>
>> [The bug description is misleading though.  More testing
>> lead to post-kernel boot problems where initrd cannot find the sata
>> devices during its init phase]
> 
> Thanks for the update.
> 
> What description would be better in your opinion?

How about: initrd fails to find /dev/sda* (sata_nv)

Benny

> 
> Rafael