Re: [KVM PATCH v4 3/3] kvm: add iosignalfd support

[Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1547 bytes --]

Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 15:11 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>   
>> Multiple cookies on the same address are required by virtio.  You can't 
>> mux since the data doesn't go anywhere.
>>
>> Virtio can survive by checking all rings on a notify, and we can later 
>> add a mechanism that has a distinct address for each ring, but let's see 
>> if we can cope with multiple cookies.  Mark?
>>     
>
> Trying to catch up, but you're talking about replacing virtio-pci
> QUEUE_NOTIFY handling with iosignalfd ?
>
> For a perfect replacement, what you really need is to be able to
> register multiple cookies per address range, but only have them trigger
> if the written data matches a provided value.
>   

Hmm..thats an interesting idea.  To date, the "cookie" has really been
for identifying the proper range selected for deassignment.  I never
thought of using it as an actual trigger value at run-time.

> If the data is lost, virtio has no way of knowing which queue is being
> notified, so we either end up with per-device, rather than per-queue,
> notifications (probably not too bad for net, at least) or a different
> notify address per queue (limiting the number of queues per device).
>   

The addr-per-queue is how I was envisioning it, but the trigger value
concept hadn't occurred to me.  I could make this an option during
assignment (e.g. "COOKIE" flag means only trigger on writes of the
provided cookie, otherwise trigger on any write).  Sound good?

Thanks Mark,
-Greg



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 266 bytes --]