public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/filters: use strcmp() instead of strncmp()
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:41:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A1F9FAC.6020506@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)

Trace filter is not working normally:

  # echo 'name == et' > tracing/events/irq/irq_handler_entry/filter
  # echo 1 > tracing/events/irq/irq_handler_entry/enable
  # cat trace_pipe
      <idle>-0     [001]  1363.423175: irq_handler_entry: irq=18 handler=eth0
      <idle>-0     [001]  1363.934528: irq_handler_entry: irq=18 handler=eth0
      ...

It's because we pass to trace_define_field() the information of
__str_loc_##item, but not the actual string, so pred->str_len == field->size
== sizeof(unsigned short), thus it always compare at most 2 bytes when
filtering on __string() field.

Since __string() is dynamic size, we are not able to set field->size to
string length. Thus this patch uses strcmp() instead of strncmp().

[ Impact: make filter facility working normally for __string() field ]

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.h               |    1 -
 kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c |    7 ++-----
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index 6e735d4..ec8970b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -758,7 +758,6 @@ struct filter_pred {
 	filter_pred_fn_t fn;
 	u64 val;
 	char str_val[MAX_FILTER_STR_VAL];
-	int str_len;
 	char *field_name;
 	int offset;
 	int not;
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
index a854eed..8362586 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static int filter_pred_string(struct filter_pred *pred, void *event,
 	char *addr = (char *)(event + pred->offset);
 	int cmp, match;
 
-	cmp = strncmp(addr, pred->str_val, pred->str_len);
+	cmp = strcmp(addr, pred->str_val);
 
 	match = (!cmp) ^ pred->not;
 
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int filter_pred_strloc(struct filter_pred *pred, void *event,
 	char *addr = (char *)(event + str_loc);
 	int cmp, match;
 
-	cmp = strncmp(addr, pred->str_val, pred->str_len);
+	cmp = strcmp(addr, pred->str_val);
 
 	match = (!cmp) ^ pred->not;
 
@@ -341,7 +341,6 @@ static void filter_clear_pred(struct filter_pred *pred)
 {
 	kfree(pred->field_name);
 	pred->field_name = NULL;
-	pred->str_len = 0;
 }
 
 static int filter_set_pred(struct filter_pred *dest,
@@ -576,7 +575,6 @@ static int filter_add_pred(struct filter_parse_state *ps,
 			fn = filter_pred_string;
 		else
 			fn = filter_pred_strloc;
-		pred->str_len = field->size;
 		if (pred->op == OP_NE)
 			pred->not = 1;
 		return filter_add_pred_fn(ps, call, pred, fn);
@@ -957,7 +955,6 @@ static struct filter_pred *create_pred(int op, char *operand1, char *operand2)
 	}
 
 	strcpy(pred->str_val, operand2);
-	pred->str_len = strlen(operand2);
 
 	pred->op = op;
 
-- 
1.5.4.rc3


             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-29  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-29  8:41 Li Zefan [this message]
2009-05-29 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing/filters: use strcmp() instead of strncmp() Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-05-30  9:06   ` Li Zefan
2009-05-30 13:52     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-05-31  8:27       ` Li Zefan
2009-05-31 13:28         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-06-01  5:45           ` Li Zefan
2009-06-01 13:09             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-06-02  0:55               ` Li Zefan
2009-09-08  3:03                 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-09  1:21                   ` Li Zefan
2009-09-09  2:00                     ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A1F9FAC.6020506@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox