Re: [KVM PATCH v4 3/3] kvm: add iosignalfd support

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

Gregory Haskins wrote:
> This is closer to how the original series worked, but Avi asked for a
> data-match token and thus the cookie was born.  I think the rationale is
> that we can't predict whether the same eventfd will be registered more
> than once, and thus we need a way to further qualify it.  However, to
> your point, I cannot think of a valid use case for having the same fd
> registered to the same address more than once, so perhaps your fd/addr
> tuple is sufficient and we can drop the cookie (or, really, rename it to
> "trigger" ;)
>
> Avi?
>   

This is just how virtio works.  To kick ring N of device X, it writes N 
to a port specific to X.

If we lose N, then we don't know which ring was kicked and have to check 
them all.

May we can rename cookie to data_match to make it explicit.  If the data 
doesn't match, the eventfd isn't kicked.

(Mark, same as we have arbitrary ring->MSI mappings (allowing one MSI to 
notify multiple rings), perhaps we should have the same capability for 
the other direction?  So the guest could kick mulitple rings with one 
write, or just one ring, according to personal preference.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function