public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] ACPI: acpi_pci_unbind should clean up properly after	acpi_pci_bind
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:42:34 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2788FA.2050606@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090604055852.18802.22743.stgit@bob.kio>

Alex Chiang wrote:
> In acpi_pci_bind, we add _PRT information for non-bridge devices, but
> we never delete that information in acpi_pci_unbind.
> 
> We also set device->ops.bind and device->ops.unbind, but never clear
> them out.
> 
> Let's make acpi_pci_unbind clean up what we did in acpi_pci_bind.
> 
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c |   11 +++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c
> index 62cb383..5fa1c5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c
> @@ -106,14 +106,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_get_pci_id);
>  
>  static int acpi_pci_unbind(struct acpi_device *device)
>  {
> +	struct pci_bus *bus;
>  	struct pci_dev *dev;
>  
>  	dev = acpi_get_pci_dev(device->handle);
>  	if (!dev)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	if (dev->subordinate)
> -		acpi_pci_irq_del_prt(dev->subordinate);
> +	if (dev->subordinate) {
> +		bus = dev->subordinate;
> +		device->ops.bind = NULL;
> +		device->ops.unbind = NULL;
> +	 } else
> +		bus = dev->bus;
> +
> +	acpi_pci_irq_del_prt(bus);
>  

I have a concern about this change.

The acpi_pci_irq_del_prt() against dev->bus removes not only
the _PRT entries for PCI function corresponding to specified
acpi_device, but also other _PRT entries for working PCI
devices/functions on the same bus. As a result, interrupt
initialization for those PCI functions would no longer work
properly after that.

So I think we should not call acpi_pci_irq_del_prt() against
dev->bus.

Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige



  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-04  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-04  5:58 [PATCH v2 00/11] Dynamic ACPI-PCI binding Alex Chiang
2009-06-04  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] ACPI: make acpi_pci_bind() static Alex Chiang
2009-06-04  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] ACPI: Introduce acpi_is_root_bridge() Alex Chiang
2009-06-04  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] ACPI: Introduce acpi_get_pci_dev() Alex Chiang
2009-06-04  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] ACPI: eviscerate pci_bind.c Alex Chiang
2009-06-04  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ACPI: simplify acpi_pci_irq_add_prt() API Alex Chiang
2009-06-04  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] ACPI: simplify acpi_pci_irq_del_prt() API Alex Chiang
2009-06-04  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] ACPI: acpi_pci_unbind should clean up properly after acpi_pci_bind Alex Chiang
2009-06-04  8:42   ` Kenji Kaneshige [this message]
2009-06-04 23:35     ` Alex Chiang
2009-06-05 15:49       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-06-05 15:59         ` Alex Chiang
2009-06-09 19:14         ` Alex Chiang
2009-06-08  3:23       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-06-09 19:09         ` Alex Chiang
2009-06-04  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] PCI Hotplug: acpiphp: convert to acpi_get_pci_dev Alex Chiang
2009-06-11 21:48   ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-11 22:17     ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-04  5:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] ACPI: kill acpi_get_pci_id Alex Chiang
2009-06-04  5:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] ACPI: video: convert to acpi_get_pci_dev Alex Chiang
2009-06-04  5:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] ACPI: kill acpi_get_physical_pci_device() Alex Chiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A2788FA.2050606@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox