Re: [PATCH] [2/2] KVM: Add VT-x machine check support

Avi Kivity
2009-06-04T13:50:09Z

Andi Kleen wrote:
>> There's no good place as it breaks the nice exit handler table. You
>> could put it in vmx_complete_interrupts() next to NMI handling.
>>
>
> I think I came up with a easy cheesy but not too bad solution now that should
> work. It simply remembers the CPU in the vcpu structure and schedules back to
> it. That's fine for this purpose.
>

We might be able schedule back in a timely manner. Why not hack
vmx_complete_interrupts()? You're still in the critical section so
you're guaranteed no delays or surprises.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function