Re: [PATCH -v4] x86: MCE: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer

[Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Huang Ying wrote:
> Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer for better
> scalability. Basic design is as follow:

That would be great.  This should be in .31, I think.

Some minor points:

>  struct mce_log {
> -	char signature[12]; /* "MACHINECHECK" */
> +	char signature[12]; /* "MACHINECHEC2" */
>  	unsigned len;	    /* = MCE_LOG_LEN */
> -	unsigned next;
>  	unsigned flags;
>  	unsigned pad0;
> -	struct mce entry[MCE_LOG_LEN];
> +	struct mce_log_cpu *mcelog_cpus;
>  };

What is this *mcelog_cpus to be used for?
It seems it will point one of per-CPU buffers (maybe cpu#0's buffer)
if I have read the following mce_log_init() correctly.

> @@ -642,6 +669,16 @@ static int mce_cap_init(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Initialize MCE per-CPU log buffer
> + */
> +static __cpuinit void mce_log_init(void)
> +{
> +	if (mcelog.mcelog_cpus)
> +		return;
> +	mcelog.mcelog_cpus = &per_cpu_var(mce_log_cpus);
> +}
> +
>  static void mce_init(void)
>  {
>  	mce_banks_t all_banks;


Next,

> +static int mce_empty_cpu(struct mce_log_cpu *mcelog_cpu)
> +{
> +	int head, tail;
> +	head = mcelog_cpu->head;
> +	tail = mcelog_cpu->tail;
> +	return head == tail;
> +}

Are there any race condition?
Why we cannot have "return (mcelog_cpu->head == mcelog_cpu->tail);"?


Last,

> +static ssize_t mce_read(struct file *filp, char __user *inubuf, size_t usize,
> +			loff_t *off)
> +{
> +	char __user *ubuf = inubuf;
> +	struct mce_log_cpu *mcelog_cpu;
> +	int cpu, new_mce, err = 0;
> +	static DEFINE_MUTEX(mce_read_mutex);
> +
(snip)
> +	return err ? : ubuf - inubuf;
>  }

It would be better to put "static DEFINE_MUTEX(mce_read_mutex)" to outside of
the function.

And it looks work, but I'd prefer:
	return err ? err : ubuf - inubuf;


Overall it looks good.
Unfortunately there were updates on tip/mce3 so I could not apply this
patch on the top of the branch.  I'd appreciate it if you could rebase
this patch again.


Thanks,
H.Seto