public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Aioanei Rares <krnl.list@gmail.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Mild filesystem corruption on ext4 (no journal)
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:32:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A298EF5.9000504@tuffmail.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A29601F.3070802@redhat.com>

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Alan Jenkins wrote:
>   
>> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>     
>
>   
>>> Maybe you could try some things in your shutdown script, such as
>>> explicitly fsyncing the file, or bmapping it with filefrag, or dropping
>>> caches and rereading it... see what the state is just before the
>>> shutdown compared to after the reboot.
>>>
>>> -Eric
>>>   
>>>       
>> Dropping caches (and running sync first) had no effect on the result of 
>> md5sum.  Hopefully that narrows it down a bit.
>>     
>
> And did the reread after dropping caches have the right data?
>   

Yes.

> Did the block numbers reported by filefrag -v change post-boot?
>   

Oh, I didn't understand that's what you were asking for.

The bug report Ted linked to says it's (most likely) a writeback issue.  
In which case I think the block numbers won't change.  I'll check 
tomorrow, and follow-up if it turns up any unexpected result.

There's also speculation that it's a core kernel issue, something that 
changed since 2.6.26.  Perhaps that explains how remount-ro + sync + 
drop_caches can leave the correct data sitting in the pagecache, without 
either writing it to disk or dropping it.

Thanks
Alan

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-05 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-05 10:49 Mild filesystem corruption on ext4 (no journal) Alan Jenkins
2009-06-05 14:40 ` Aioanei Rares
2009-06-05 14:49   ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-05 15:20     ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-05 16:43       ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-05 16:51         ` Kay Sievers
2009-06-05 21:42           ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-06  4:17             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-06-05 18:12         ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-05 21:32           ` Alan Jenkins [this message]
2009-06-05 22:02             ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-05 18:01   ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-05 21:34     ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-05 21:42     ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2009-06-09  4:15       ` Michael Rubin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A298EF5.9000504@tuffmail.co.uk \
    --to=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
    --cc=krnl.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox