From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Aioanei Rares <krnl.list@gmail.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Mild filesystem corruption on ext4 (no journal)
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:32:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A298EF5.9000504@tuffmail.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A29601F.3070802@redhat.com>
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Alan Jenkins wrote:
>
>> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>
>
>>> Maybe you could try some things in your shutdown script, such as
>>> explicitly fsyncing the file, or bmapping it with filefrag, or dropping
>>> caches and rereading it... see what the state is just before the
>>> shutdown compared to after the reboot.
>>>
>>> -Eric
>>>
>>>
>> Dropping caches (and running sync first) had no effect on the result of
>> md5sum. Hopefully that narrows it down a bit.
>>
>
> And did the reread after dropping caches have the right data?
>
Yes.
> Did the block numbers reported by filefrag -v change post-boot?
>
Oh, I didn't understand that's what you were asking for.
The bug report Ted linked to says it's (most likely) a writeback issue.
In which case I think the block numbers won't change. I'll check
tomorrow, and follow-up if it turns up any unexpected result.
There's also speculation that it's a core kernel issue, something that
changed since 2.6.26. Perhaps that explains how remount-ro + sync +
drop_caches can leave the correct data sitting in the pagecache, without
either writing it to disk or dropping it.
Thanks
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-05 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-05 10:49 Mild filesystem corruption on ext4 (no journal) Alan Jenkins
2009-06-05 14:40 ` Aioanei Rares
2009-06-05 14:49 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-05 15:20 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-05 16:43 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-05 16:51 ` Kay Sievers
2009-06-05 21:42 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-06 4:17 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-06-05 18:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-05 21:32 ` Alan Jenkins [this message]
2009-06-05 22:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-05 18:01 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-05 21:34 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-05 21:42 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2009-06-09 4:15 ` Michael Rubin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A298EF5.9000504@tuffmail.co.uk \
--to=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=krnl.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox