From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4] x86: MCE: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:17:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2C66BF.5000401@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244191174.8361.517.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com>
Huang Ying wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 16:28 +0800, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
>> Huang Ying wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 15:01 +0800, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
>>>> Huang Ying wrote:
>>>>> struct mce_log {
>>>>> - char signature[12]; /* "MACHINECHECK" */
>>>>> + char signature[12]; /* "MACHINECHEC2" */
>>>>> unsigned len; /* = MCE_LOG_LEN */
>>>>> - unsigned next;
>>>>> unsigned flags;
>>>>> unsigned pad0;
>>>>> - struct mce entry[MCE_LOG_LEN];
>>>>> + struct mce_log_cpu *mcelog_cpus;
>>>>> };
>>>> What is this *mcelog_cpus to be used for?
>>>> It seems it will point one of per-CPU buffers (maybe cpu#0's buffer)
>>>> if I have read the following mce_log_init() correctly.
>>> It is mainly used by something like kdump, which can search
>>> "MACHINECHEC2", and analyze mce_log. mcelog_cpus can help kdump find the
>>> real mcelog storage.
>> Hum, but it help tools only to find one of buffers, not to find all.
>>
>> I think it would be better help for tools if we have another signature
>> on struct mce_log_cpu, e.g.:
>>
>> +struct mce_log_cpu {
>> + char signature[**]; /* "MCE_LOG_CPU_VER_1" or so */
>> + __u32 cpuid; /* cpuid or extcpu, same as struct mce */
>> + int head;
>> + int tail;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + struct mce entry[MCE_LOG_LEN];
>> +};
>>
>> How about this?
>
> + mcelog.mcelog_cpus = &per_cpu_var(mce_log_cpus);
>
> So mcelog.mcelog_cpus are pointed to the buffers of all CPUs, not just
> that of one CPU. You can find them by analyzing PER cpu data structure.
I thought that the signature is used to find the structure without such
analyzing. If a tool can analyze PER cpu data, then it likely know
where the mce_log_cpu is, so mcelog.mcelog_cpus will not be required.
#define per_cpu_var(var) per_cpu__##var
#define per_cpu(var, cpu) \
(*SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR(&per_cpu_var(var), per_cpu_offset(cpu)))
OK, I have mistook per_cpu_var() for per_cpu().
Then mcelog.mcelog_cpus does not point any of the buffers, but tells where
the buffer is locating in each of PER cpu data.
Tools have to get per_cpu_offset(cpu) to know where the PER cpu data
allocated. According to pcpu_alloc_bootmem(), it might consider NUMA.
Anyway It will take a bit more effort.
So still I think the mcelog.mcelog_cpus is mostly pointless.
Thanks,
H.Seto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-08 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-04 3:11 [PATCH -v4] x86: MCE: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer Huang Ying
2009-06-04 5:56 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-05 7:01 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-05 8:08 ` Huang Ying
2009-06-05 8:28 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-05 8:39 ` Huang Ying
2009-06-08 1:17 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2009-06-08 2:05 ` Huang Ying
2009-06-08 3:09 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2C66BF.5000401@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox