From: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: extensible perf_counter_attr
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:50:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2DB1C6.6090209@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090608215002.GB22049@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 14:18 -0700, Corey Ashford wrote:
>>>> pca.ext_attrs = &feature.head; /* secretly know that there's data
>>>> that lies past the attr struct header */
>>> Right, except its not so very secret since we have the type field
>>> telling us.
>> I see. Thanks for the explanation. Looks like a good plan to me!
>
> i think we'd have a much simpler implementation by changing
> __reserved_1 to attr_size. When the kernel adds new attributes, the
> size will increase - old user-space will use the old size which the
> kernel detects and adopts to (by zeroing out that attribute space).
>
> That way we'll always have a nice flat attributes structure, with no
> quirky chaining that has field-dependent data types ...
>
> Ingo
If I understand you correctly, you would simply make perf_counter_attr larger
every time you want to add a new attribute. Users using the new attributes
would call sys_perf_counter_open with a larger attr_size value.
What about arch-dependent attributes? Would you want to place them all in the
perf_counter_attr struct? I suppose this could be done by #include'ing an
arch-specific .h file.
- Corey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 17:25 [PATCH] perf_counter: extensible perf_counter_attr Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-08 19:02 ` Corey Ashford
2009-06-08 19:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-08 21:18 ` Corey Ashford
2009-06-08 21:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-08 21:29 ` Corey Ashford
2009-06-08 21:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-09 0:50 ` Corey Ashford [this message]
2009-06-09 6:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-09 8:13 ` Corey Ashford
2009-06-09 11:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-09 16:44 ` Corey Ashford
2009-06-09 22:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-09 23:16 ` Corey Ashford
2009-06-10 0:14 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-06-10 22:06 ` Corey Ashford
2009-06-09 4:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-06-09 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-09 9:58 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2DB1C6.6090209@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox