From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sunrpc: Adding trace points to status routines (take 2)
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:18:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2EA789.60608@RedHat.com> (raw)
Hey Trond,
Here is an updated version of the patch I sent out a while
back... all that has changed was the addtion of 'rpc_' to
the name of the trace points which coincides with the
other trace points naming convention.
Here is a pointer to the previous email that has the
fairly long winded explanation of how all this works:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124058933520183&w=2
And below is the updated patch which is based on Ingo's
linux-2.6-tip.git tree.
Comments?
steved.
Author: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Jun 9 14:12:07 EDT 2009
Adds three trace points to the status routines in the
sunrpc state machine. The trace points will only execute
in error conditions.
The goal of these trace points it to make it easier to
debug process that spin or get hung up in the NFS and
related subsystems.
Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
diff --git a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f502eb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+#if !defined(_TRACE_SUNRPC_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+#define _TRACE_SUNRPC_H
+
+#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
+
+#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
+#define TRACE_SYSTEM sunrpc
+
+TRACE_EVENT(rpc_call_status,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct rpc_task *task),
+
+ TP_ARGS(task),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(u32, cl_prog)
+ __field(u32, cl_vers)
+ __field(u32, p_proc)
+ __field(int, tk_status)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+ __entry->cl_vers = task->tk_client->cl_vers;
+ __entry->p_proc = task->tk_client->cl_procinfo->p_proc;
+ __entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+ __entry->tk_status = task->tk_status;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("%d[%d]:%d status=%d", __entry->cl_prog,
+ __entry->cl_vers,__entry->p_proc, __entry->tk_status)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(rpc_bind_status,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct rpc_task *task),
+
+ TP_ARGS(task),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(u32, cl_prog)
+ __field(u32, cl_vers)
+ __field(u32, p_proc)
+ __field(int, tk_status)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+ __entry->cl_vers = task->tk_client->cl_vers;
+ __entry->p_proc = task->tk_client->cl_procinfo->p_proc;
+ __entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+ __entry->tk_status = task->tk_status;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("%d[%d]:%d status=%d", __entry->cl_prog,
+ __entry->cl_vers,__entry->p_proc, __entry->tk_status)
+);
+TRACE_EVENT(rpc_connect_status,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct rpc_task *task, int status),
+
+ TP_ARGS(task, status),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(u32, cl_prog)
+ __field(u32, cl_vers)
+ __field(u32, p_proc)
+ __field(int, tk_status)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+ __entry->cl_vers = task->tk_client->cl_vers;
+ __entry->p_proc = task->tk_client->cl_procinfo->p_proc;
+ __entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+ __entry->tk_status = status;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("%d[%d]:%d status=%d", __entry->cl_prog,
+ __entry->cl_vers,__entry->p_proc, __entry->tk_status)
+
+);
+#endif /* __TRACE_SUNRPC_H */
+
+/* This part must be outside protection */
+#include <trace/define_trace.h>
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
index 5abab09..b86ee2a 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
#include <linux/sunrpc/rpc_pipe_fs.h>
#include <linux/sunrpc/metrics.h>
+#include <linux/ftrace.h>
+#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
+#include <trace/events/sunrpc.h>
#ifdef RPC_DEBUG
# define RPCDBG_FACILITY RPCDBG_CALL
@@ -957,6 +960,7 @@ call_bind_status(struct rpc_task *task)
return;
}
+ trace_rpc_bind_status(task);
switch (task->tk_status) {
case -ENOMEM:
dprintk("RPC: %5u rpcbind out of memory\n", task->tk_pid);
@@ -1038,6 +1042,7 @@ call_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task)
return;
}
+ trace_rpc_connect_status(task, status);
switch (status) {
/* if soft mounted, test if we've timed out */
case -ETIMEDOUT:
@@ -1141,6 +1146,7 @@ call_status(struct rpc_task *task)
return;
}
+ trace_rpc_call_status(task);
task->tk_status = 0;
switch(status) {
case -EHOSTDOWN:
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-09 18:18 Steve Dickson [this message]
2009-06-16 0:56 ` [PATCH] sunrpc: Adding trace points to status routines (take 2) Trond Myklebust
2009-06-18 17:22 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2EA789.60608@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox