From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756842AbZFJBfT (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:35:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753670AbZFJBfI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:35:08 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:57613 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752390AbZFJBfH (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:35:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4A2F0E26.9010203@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:36:38 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt CC: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing/events/ring-buffer: block trace points and fix References: <20090609163657.557589106@goodmis.org> <20090609234655.GA24118@elte.hu> <4A2F0C4A.8020109@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> In file included from mm/highmem.c:30: >>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:223: warning: ?struct request? declared inside parameter list >>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:223: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want >>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h: In function ?blk_cmd_buf_len?: >>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:225: error: implicit declaration of function ?blk_pc_request? >>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:225: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type >>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h: At top level: >>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:228: warning: ?struct request? declared inside parameter list >>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:230: warning: ?struct request? declared inside parameter list >>> distcc[15629] ERROR: compile mm/highmem.c on a/32 failed >>> >> I've fixed it. I'll post a new version after I've done some >> more building tests. > > Ingo, > > Should Li post a delta fix, or should we just rebase? > I thought we should rebase it, since it causes building failure which might hurt bisectability.