From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756863AbZFKGJT (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:09:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751949AbZFKGJL (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:09:11 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:63267 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752089AbZFKGJK (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:09:10 -0400 Message-ID: <4A309FDD.4030804@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:10:37 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pekka J Enberg CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, yinghai@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: use slab in cpupri_init() References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > @@ -163,9 +167,7 @@ int __init_refok cpupri_init(struct cpupri *cp, bool bootmem) so the __init_refok tag can be removed, no? > > spin_lock_init(&vec->lock); > vec->count = 0; > - if (bootmem) > - alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&vec->mask); > - else if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&vec->mask, GFP_KERNEL)) > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&vec->mask, gfp)) > goto cleanup; > } >