From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Bug: fio traps into kernel without exiting because futex has a deadloop
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:21:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A30A25F.1080503@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244701128.6691.5.camel@laptop>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 07:55 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:08 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>>> I investigate a fio hang issue. When I run fio multi-process
>>> testing on many disks, fio traps into kernel and doesn't exit
>>> (mostly hit once after runing sub test cases for hundreds of times).
>>>
>>> Oprofile data shows kernel consumes time with some futex functions.
>>> Command kill couldn't kill the process and machine reboot also hangs.
>>>
>>> Eventually, I locate the root cause as a bug of futex. Kernel enters
>>> a deadloop between 'retry' and 'goto retry' in function futex_wake_op.
>>> By unknown reason (might be an issue of fio or glibc), parameter uaddr2
>>> points to an area which is READONLY. So futex_atomic_op_inuser returns
>>> -EFAULT when trying to changing the data at uaddr2, but later get_user
>>> still succeeds becasue the area is READONLY. Then go back to retry.
>>>
>>> I create a simple test case to trigger it, which just shmat an READONLY
>>> area for address uaddr2.
>>>
>>> It could be used as a DOS attack.
>
> /me has morning juice and notices he sent the wrong commit...
>
> commit 64d1304a64477629cb16b75491a77bafe6f86963
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date: Mon May 18 21:20:10 2009 +0200
>
> futex: setup writeable mapping for futex ops which modify user space data
Yup, that's the one. I was trying to locate it myself, but you beat me
to it. Thanks Peter.
--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-11 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-11 3:08 Bug: fio traps into kernel without exiting because futex has a deadloop Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-11 5:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-11 6:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-11 6:21 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2009-06-11 8:33 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-11 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-11 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-12 0:59 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-12 8:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-12 8:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-15 6:03 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-15 7:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-16 3:16 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-15 8:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-15 8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-11 5:58 ` Darren Hart
2009-06-11 6:05 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A30A25F.1080503@us.ibm.com \
--to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox