From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
paolo.valente@unimore.it, ryov@valinux.co.jp,
fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
taka@valinux.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com,
m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, jbaron@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com,
snitzer@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:10:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A30BC0F.3000401@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244513342-11758-11-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
>
> /*
> @@ -1296,6 +1302,13 @@ void io_group_chain_link(struct request_queue *q, void *key,
> iog = io_cgroup_lookup_group(iocg, key);
> io_group_set_parent(prev, iog);
> }
> +
> + if (unlikely(efqd->only_root_group))
> + /*
> + * TODO: Take care of force expiry of existing queue before
> + * new queue is queued.
> + */
> + efqd->only_root_group = 0;
Hi Vivek,
This flag isn't set back when all child groups go away. Am i missing something?
BTW, why not just determine "only root group" by cgroup itself? Although there might be
some impact if cgroup is built but no request goes into it. but i think this isn't a big
deal. How about the following patch?
Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
block/elevator-fq.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
block/elevator-fq.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c
index a516dce..f33155c 100644
--- a/block/elevator-fq.c
+++ b/block/elevator-fq.c
@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ void elv_del_ioq_busy(struct elevator_queue *e, struct io_queue *ioq,
void elv_activate_ioq(struct io_queue *ioq, int add_front);
void elv_deactivate_ioq(struct elv_fq_data *efqd, struct io_queue *ioq,
int requeue);
-
static int bfq_update_next_active(struct io_sched_data *sd)
{
struct io_group *iog;
@@ -1131,6 +1130,14 @@ struct io_cgroup io_root_cgroup = {
.ioprio_class = IO_DEFAULT_GRP_CLASS,
};
+static int is_only_root_group(void)
+{
+ if (list_empty(&io_root_cgroup.css.cgroup->children))
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
void bfq_init_entity(struct io_entity *entity, struct io_group *iog)
{
entity->ioprio = entity->new_ioprio;
@@ -1543,13 +1550,6 @@ void io_group_chain_link(struct request_queue *q, void *key,
iog = io_cgroup_lookup_group(iocg, key);
io_group_set_parent(prev, iog);
}
-
- if (unlikely(efqd->only_root_group))
- /*
- * TODO: Take care of force expiry of existing queue before
- * new queue is queued.
- */
- efqd->only_root_group = 0;
}
/**
@@ -3601,7 +3601,7 @@ void *elv_fq_select_ioq(struct request_queue *q, int force)
* overhead.
*/
- if (efqd->only_root_group && elv_iosched_single_ioq(q->elevator)) {
+ if (is_only_root_group() && elv_iosched_single_ioq(q->elevator)) {
elv_log_ioq(efqd, ioq, "select: only root group, no expiry");
goto keep_queue;
}
@@ -3872,7 +3872,7 @@ void elv_ioq_completed_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
* unnecessary overhead.
*/
- if (efqd->only_root_group &&
+ if (is_only_root_group() &&
elv_iosched_single_ioq(q->elevator)) {
elv_log_ioq(efqd, ioq, "select: only root group,"
" no expiry");
@@ -4019,7 +4019,6 @@ int elv_init_fq_data(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
/* For the time being keep fairness enabled by default */
efqd->fairness = 1;
- efqd->only_root_group = 1;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.h b/block/elevator-fq.h
index 1b1fb0b..0939735 100644
--- a/block/elevator-fq.h
+++ b/block/elevator-fq.h
@@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ struct elv_fq_data {
* queues.
*/
unsigned int fairness;
- int only_root_group;
};
extern int elv_slice_idle;
--
1.5.4.rc3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-11 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-09 2:08 [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V4 Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 01/19] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 02/19] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 8:45 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-16 3:54 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-16 13:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-16 19:44 ` Divyesh Shah
2009-06-17 12:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 03/19] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 04/19] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-06-11 6:12 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-11 14:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-15 8:56 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-15 13:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-17 2:22 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-17 13:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 05/19] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 06/19] io-controller: cfq changes to use " Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 07/19] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 08/19] io-controller: idle for sometime on sync queue before expiring it Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 09/19] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 10/19] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-06-11 8:10 ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
2009-06-11 14:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-12 0:37 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-15 13:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 11/19] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 12/19] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 13/19] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 14/19] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 15/19] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-06-17 9:17 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-17 13:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:08 ` [PATCH 16/19] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:09 ` [PATCH 17/19] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal
2009-06-10 7:44 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-10 13:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:09 ` [PATCH 18/19] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 1:40 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 14:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 6:26 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 14:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 2:09 ` [PATCH 19/19] io-controller: experimental debug patch for async queue wait before expiry Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09 4:22 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V4 Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-09 13:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-10 1:05 ` Gui Jianfeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A30BC0F.3000401@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
--cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=nauman@google.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox