From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757057AbZFKS0k (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:26:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754850AbZFKS0c (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:26:32 -0400 Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:3480 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754820AbZFKS0c (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:26:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4A314CB6.5090004@ru.mvista.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:28:06 +0400 From: Sergei Shtylyov Organization: MontaVista Software Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en-gb MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 resend] libata-sff: avoid byte swapping in ata_sff_data_xfer() References: <200902152230.38271.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <49DB199C.3040305@ru.mvista.com> <4A242C81.3080309@ru.mvista.com> <4A314AC7.40300@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <4A314AC7.40300@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Hello, I wrote: >>>> Handling of the trailing byte in ata_sff_data_xfer() is suboptimal >>>> bacause: >>>> - it always initializes the padding buffer to 0 which is not really >>>> needed in >>>> both the read and write cases; >>>> - it has to use memcpy() to transfer a single byte from/to the >>>> padding buffer; >>>> - it uses io{read|write}16() accessors which swap bytes on the big >>>> endian CPUs >>>> and so have to additionally convert the data from/to the little >>>> endian format >>>> instead of using io{read|write}16_rep() accessors which are not >>>> supposed to >>>> change the byte ordering. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov >>> Jeff, have you forgotten about this one? >> PING. > This has been queued to libata-dev.git#upstream, i.e. linux-next queue, Ah, haven't looked there, so it appeared as forgotten since I know you usually reply with 'applied'. > for a long time. Apologies if I forgot the 'applied' reply. > Just sent this upstream, as linux-ide should show. Thanks. I began to think of reworking it to avoid even io*_rep() as per my followup mail and resending... well, it's good enogh as is. :-) > Jeff MBR, Sergei