From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/filters: fix race between filter setting and module unload
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:39:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A375A4D.6000205@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A375A30.9060802@cn.fujitsu.com>
Module unload is protected by event_mutex, while setting filter is
protected by filter_mutex. This leads to the race:
echo 'bar == 0 || bar == 10' \ |
> sample/filter |
| insmod sample.ko
add_pred("bar == 0") |
-> n_preds == 1 |
add_pred("bar == 100") |
-> n_preds == 2 |
| rmmod sample.ko
| insmod sample.ko
add_pred("&&") |
-> n_preds == 1 (should be 3) |
Now event->filter->preds is corrupted. An then when filter_match_preds()
is called, the WARN_ON() in it will be triggered.
To avoid the race, we remove filter_mutex, and replace it with event_mutex.
[ fix race that can cause WARN_ON (even sth worse) when filtering events ]
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
index d9f01c1..936c621 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
#include "trace.h"
#include "trace_output.h"
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(filter_mutex);
-
enum filter_op_ids
{
OP_OR,
@@ -294,12 +292,12 @@ void print_event_filter(struct ftrace_event_call *call, struct trace_seq *s)
{
struct event_filter *filter = call->filter;
- mutex_lock(&filter_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
if (filter->filter_string)
trace_seq_printf(s, "%s\n", filter->filter_string);
else
trace_seq_printf(s, "none\n");
- mutex_unlock(&filter_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
}
void print_subsystem_event_filter(struct event_subsystem *system,
@@ -307,12 +305,12 @@ void print_subsystem_event_filter(struct event_subsystem *system,
{
struct event_filter *filter = system->filter;
- mutex_lock(&filter_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
if (filter->filter_string)
trace_seq_printf(s, "%s\n", filter->filter_string);
else
trace_seq_printf(s, "none\n");
- mutex_unlock(&filter_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
}
static struct ftrace_event_field *
@@ -434,7 +432,6 @@ static void filter_free_subsystem_preds(struct event_subsystem *system)
filter->n_preds = 0;
}
- mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(call, &ftrace_events, list) {
if (!call->define_fields)
continue;
@@ -444,7 +441,6 @@ static void filter_free_subsystem_preds(struct event_subsystem *system)
remove_filter_string(call->filter);
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
}
static int filter_add_pred_fn(struct filter_parse_state *ps,
@@ -631,7 +627,6 @@ static int filter_add_subsystem_pred(struct filter_parse_state *ps,
filter->preds[filter->n_preds] = pred;
filter->n_preds++;
- mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(call, &ftrace_events, list) {
if (!call->define_fields)
@@ -642,14 +637,12 @@ static int filter_add_subsystem_pred(struct filter_parse_state *ps,
err = filter_add_pred(ps, call, pred);
if (err) {
- mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
filter_free_subsystem_preds(system);
parse_error(ps, FILT_ERR_BAD_SUBSYS_FILTER, 0);
goto out;
}
replace_filter_string(call->filter, filter_string);
}
- mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
out:
return err;
}
@@ -1076,12 +1069,12 @@ int apply_event_filter(struct ftrace_event_call *call, char *filter_string)
struct filter_parse_state *ps;
- mutex_lock(&filter_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
if (!strcmp(strstrip(filter_string), "0")) {
filter_disable_preds(call);
remove_filter_string(call->filter);
- mutex_unlock(&filter_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -1109,7 +1102,7 @@ out:
postfix_clear(ps);
kfree(ps);
out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&filter_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -1121,12 +1114,12 @@ int apply_subsystem_event_filter(struct event_subsystem *system,
struct filter_parse_state *ps;
- mutex_lock(&filter_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
if (!strcmp(strstrip(filter_string), "0")) {
filter_free_subsystem_preds(system);
remove_filter_string(system->filter);
- mutex_unlock(&filter_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -1154,7 +1147,7 @@ out:
postfix_clear(ps);
kfree(ps);
out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&filter_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
return err;
}
--
1.5.4.rc3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-16 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-16 8:39 [PATCH 1/2] tracing/filters: free filter_string in destroy_preds() Li Zefan
2009-06-16 8:39 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2009-06-17 11:13 ` [tip:tracing/urgent] tracing/filters: fix race between filter setting and module unload tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-06-17 11:13 ` [tip:tracing/urgent] tracing/filters: free filter_string in destroy_preds() tip-bot for Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A375A4D.6000205@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox