public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: cl@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx 01/11] Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:19:37 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A38A719.2030709@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090605191850.441840884@gentwo.org>

Hello,

cl@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> +#ifndef this_cpu_write
> +# define this_cpu_write(pcp, val)	__this_cpu_write((pcp), (val))
> +#endif

Is this safe?  Write itself would always be atomic but this means that
a percpu variable may change its value while a thread is holding the
processor by disabling preemption.  ie,

0. v contains A for cpu0

1. task0 on cpu0 does this_cpu_write(v, B), looks up cpu but gets
   preemted out.

2. task1 gets scheduled on cpu1, disables preemption and does
   __this_cpu_read(v) and gets A and goes on with preemtion disabled.

3. task0 gets scheduled on cpu1 and executes the assignment.

4. task1 does __this_cpu_read(v) again and oops gets B this time.

Please note that this can also happen between addition or other
modifying ops and cause incorrect result.

Also, these macros depricate percpu_OP() macros, right?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-17  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-05 19:18 [this_cpu_xx 00/11] Introduce this_cpu_xx operations cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 01/11] Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations cl
2009-06-10  5:12   ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-11 15:10     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-12  2:09       ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-12 14:18         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-17  8:09           ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-17  8:19   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-06-17 18:41     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-18  1:08       ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-18  3:01       ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 02/11] Use this_cpu operations for SNMP statistics cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 03/11] Use this_cpu operations for NFS statistics cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 04/11] Use this_cpu ops for network statistics cl
2009-06-08 11:27   ` Robin Holt
2009-06-08 20:49     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-08 20:54       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 05/11] this_cpu_ptr: Straight transformations cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 06/11] Eliminate get/put_cpu cl
2009-06-05 19:34   ` Dan Williams
2009-06-09 14:02     ` Sosnowski, Maciej
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 07/11] xfs_icsb_modify_counters does not need "cpu" variable cl
2009-06-05 19:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 19:36     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 08/11] Use this_cpu_ptr in crypto subsystem cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 09/11] X86 optimized this_cpu operations cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 10/11] Use this_cpu ops for vm statistics cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 11/11] RCU: Use this_cpu operations cl
2009-06-10 17:42   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A38A719.2030709@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox