From: Linda Walsh <lkml@tlinx.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: non-standard config in my running distro Default kernel: Effect?
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:26:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A395F80.7060504@tlinx.org> (raw)
I found what appears to be a "non-standard configuration" in a
distro's "Default-SMP", non-Xen kernel, where /proc/config.gz
from the running kernel has (I only ran into this doing a diff between
a manually constructed config and my running kernel):
CONFIG_X86_SMP=y
CONFIG_X86_64_SMP=y
But does NOT have:
CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS=y
From what I can tell, this shouldn't be a possible configuration, since
CONFIG_X86_SMP should force it to be set to 'y' (not unset).
Would this config, (SMP='y', generic_smp_helpers=(undef) ) have any
odd effects? Is there a specific "effect" or "feature" one gets
by having 'smp=y' but not having the smp_helpers enabled?
In my x86_64 arch, the places I see it tested are:
block/blk-softirq.c:
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS)
#else /* CONFIG_SMP && CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS */
block/blk-sysfs.c:
#if defined(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS)
include/linux/smp.h:
#ifdef CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
/kernel/Kconfig.hz:
def_bool HIGH_RES_TIMERS && (!SMP || USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS)
kernel/softirq.c:
#ifdef CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
#else /* CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS */
---
It appears it may disable some softirq routines.
In include/linux/smp.h, having it undefined would disable the definition
of the functions:
generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt,
generic_smp_call_function_interrupt,
ipi_call_lock, ipi_call_unlock,
ipi_call_lock_irq & ipi_call_unlock_irq
Does this have any performance or integrity (lost interrupt)
implications?
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-17 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-17 21:26 Linda Walsh [this message]
2009-06-17 21:46 ` IGNORE: Re: non-standard config in my running distro Default kernel: Effect? Linda Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A395F80.7060504@tlinx.org \
--to=lkml@tlinx.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox