public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linda Walsh <lkml@tlinx.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: IGNORE: Re: non-standard config in my running distro Default kernel: Effect?
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:46:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A39641D.2090201@tlinx.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A395F80.7060504@tlinx.org>

Please ignore this non-issue.  I should have sorted my
compare files.  (Sigh)...

Linda Walsh wrote:
>
> I found what appears to be a "non-standard configuration" in a
> distro's "Default-SMP", non-Xen kernel, where /proc/config.gz
> from the running kernel has (I only ran into this doing a diff between
> a manually constructed config and my running kernel):
>
>    CONFIG_X86_SMP=y
>    CONFIG_X86_64_SMP=y
>
> But does NOT have:
>
>    CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS=y
>
> From what I can tell, this shouldn't be a possible configuration, since
> CONFIG_X86_SMP should force it to be set to 'y' (not unset).
>
> Would this config, (SMP='y', generic_smp_helpers=(undef) ) have any
> odd effects?  Is there a specific "effect" or "feature" one gets
> by having 'smp=y' but not having the smp_helpers enabled?
>
> In my x86_64 arch, the places I see it tested are:
>
> block/blk-softirq.c:
>    #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS)
>    #else /* CONFIG_SMP && CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS */
> block/blk-sysfs.c:
>    #if defined(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS)
> include/linux/smp.h:
>    #ifdef CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> /kernel/Kconfig.hz:
>    def_bool HIGH_RES_TIMERS && (!SMP || USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS)
> kernel/softirq.c:
>    #ifdef CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
>    #else /* CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS */
>
> ---
> It appears it may disable some softirq routines.
>
> In include/linux/smp.h, having it undefined would disable the 
> definition of the functions:
>  generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt,
>  generic_smp_call_function_interrupt,
>  ipi_call_lock,      ipi_call_unlock,
>  ipi_call_lock_irq & ipi_call_unlock_irq
>
> Does this have any performance or integrity (lost interrupt)
> implications?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


      reply	other threads:[~2009-06-17 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-17 21:26 non-standard config in my running distro Default kernel: Effect? Linda Walsh
2009-06-17 21:46 ` Linda Walsh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A39641D.2090201@tlinx.org \
    --to=lkml@tlinx.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox