From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755554AbZFSDM6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:12:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751547AbZFSDMv (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:12:51 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:60246 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751371AbZFSDMu (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:12:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4A3B028C.2040902@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:14:20 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Weisbecker CC: Jason Baron , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, jiayingz@google.com, bligh@google.com, roland@redhat.com, fche@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] add syscall tracepoints References: <51b4e9aff767dac4933ebb7835dee7068b158db8.1244837725.git.jbaron@redhat.com> <20090619021418.GC7903@nowhere> In-Reply-To: <20090619021418.GC7903@nowhere> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 05:24:59PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote: >> update FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX to the current number of syscalls >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron >> >> --- >> arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h | 4 ++-- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h >> index bd2c651..d16d195 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h >> @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ >> >> /* FIXME: I don't want to stay hardcoded */ > > > BTW, is there a way to know this size dynamically? > Or is there already a hardcoded number of syscalls somewhere > in x86? > Does this patchset head for .31 or .32? If for .32, then this patch should go into .31 I think.