From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
avi@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] eventfd: add internal reference counting to fix notifier race conditions
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:05:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3D875A.9040101@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906201202170.25534@makko.or.mcafeemobile.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6468 bytes --]
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>
>>> In the POLLIN event, you schedule_work(&irqfd->inject) and there are no
>>> races there AFAICS (you basically do not care of anything eventfd memory
>>> related at all).
>>> For POLLHUP, you do:
>>>
>>> spin_lock(irqfd->slock);
>>> if (irqfd->wqh)
>>> schedule_work(&irqfd->inject);
>>> irqfd->wqh = NULL;
>>> spin_unlock(irqfd->slock);
>>>
>>> In your work function you notice the POLLHUP condition and take proper
>>> action (dunno what it is in your case).
>>> In your kvm_irqfd_release() function:
>>>
>>> spin_lock(irqfd->slock);
>>> if (irqfd->wqh)
>>> remove_wait_queue(irqfd->wqh, &irqfd->wait);
>>> irqfd->wqh = NULL;
>>> spin_unlock(irqfd->slock);
>>>
>>> Any races in there?
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, for one you have an ABBA deadlock on the irqfd->slock and wqh->lock
>> (recall wqh has to be locked to fix that other race I mentioned).
>>
>
> Yep, true. How about we go in little steps?
> How about the one below?
> When you register your poll callback, you get a reference with
> eventfd_refget().
>
I was thinking about this last night/this morning and that was
essentially what I was going to propose next as a more palatable+simpler
solution.
> At that point we have no more worries about the eventfd memory (namely
> "wqh") going away.
> Symmetrically, you use eventfd_refput() once you done with it.
> So we basically de-couple the internal VFS refcount, from the eventfd
> context memory refcount.
> Where are the non-solveable races on the IRQfd side, of an approach like
> this one?
>
None... I think that can work. The core requirements boil down to: 1)
locking the POLLHUP (as we already discussed), and 2) holding a kref (or
equivelent) to the eventfd_ctx that the client can release once they are
fully out. After that, it looks like any vanilla wait-queue in the kernel.
>
>
>
>> Yes, understood. What I was trying to gently say is that the one-liner
>> proposal alone is still broken afaict. However, if there is another
>> solution that works that you like better than 133-liner I posted, I am
>> more than willing to help analyze it. In the end, I only care that this
>> is fixed.
>>
>
> Is it so?
> What I noticed here, is that you went from "Detailed Mode" (in the emails
> where you were pushing the new bits), to "Hint Mode" (as below) when it
> was time to see if there were simpler solutions to the problem.
>
I wasn't being purposely coy. It was late friday and I was getting
pressure from the wife to get off the computer ;) Plus, all the details
were in my patch, so I figured there wasn't a giant need to rehash since
it could just be gleened. In any case, based on this current reply I
think we are on the same page now.
>
>> (As a hint, I think I fixed 4-5 races with these patches, so there are a
>> few others still lurking as well)
>>
>
> Not knowing the details of IRQfd, hinting only is not going to help
> anything in this case.
>
>
>
> - Davide
>
>
>
> ---
> fs/eventfd.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/eventfd.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
I haven't had a chance to go over the patch below in detail, but the
30,000 foot view is that it is in line with what I was thinking this
morning. So, its a preliminary "looks good". I'll take a closer look ASAP
Thanks Davide,
-Greg
> Index: linux-2.6.mod/fs/eventfd.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.mod.orig/fs/eventfd.c 2009-06-20 13:08:22.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.mod/fs/eventfd.c 2009-06-20 14:00:23.000000000 -0700
> @@ -17,8 +17,10 @@
> #include <linux/eventfd.h>
> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/kref.h>
>
> struct eventfd_ctx {
> + struct kref kref;
> wait_queue_head_t wqh;
> /*
> * Every time that a write(2) is performed on an eventfd, the
> @@ -59,9 +61,19 @@ int eventfd_signal(struct file *file, in
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eventfd_signal);
>
> +static void eventfd_free(struct kref *kref)
> +{
> + struct eventfd_ctx *ctx = container_of(kref, struct eventfd_ctx, kref);
> +
> + kfree(ctx);
> +}
> +
> static int eventfd_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> - kfree(file->private_data);
> + struct eventfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
> +
> + wake_up_poll(&ctx->wqh, POLLHUP);
> + kref_put(&ctx->kref, eventfd_free);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -201,6 +213,28 @@ struct file *eventfd_fget(int fd)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eventfd_fget);
>
> +int eventfd_refget(struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct eventfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
> +
> + if (file->f_op != &eventfd_fops)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + kref_get(&ctx->kref);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eventfd_refget);
> +
> +int eventfd_refput(struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct eventfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
> +
> + if (file->f_op != &eventfd_fops)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + kref_put(&ctx->kref, eventfd_free);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eventfd_refput);
> +
> SYSCALL_DEFINE2(eventfd2, unsigned int, count, int, flags)
> {
> int fd;
> @@ -217,6 +251,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(eventfd2, unsigned int,
> if (!ctx)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + kref_init(&ctx->kref);
> init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->wqh);
> ctx->count = count;
> ctx->flags = flags;
> Index: linux-2.6.mod/include/linux/eventfd.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.mod.orig/include/linux/eventfd.h 2009-06-20 13:08:22.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.mod/include/linux/eventfd.h 2009-06-20 13:59:09.000000000 -0700
> @@ -29,12 +29,18 @@
>
> struct file *eventfd_fget(int fd);
> int eventfd_signal(struct file *file, int n);
> +int eventfd_refget(struct file *file);
> +int eventfd_refput(struct file *file);
>
> #else /* CONFIG_EVENTFD */
>
> #define eventfd_fget(fd) ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS)
> static inline int eventfd_signal(struct file *file, int n)
> { return 0; }
> +static inline int eventfd_refget(struct file *file)
> +{ return -ENOSYS; }
> +static inline int eventfd_refput(struct file *file)
> +{ return -ENOSYS; }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_EVENTFD */
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 266 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-21 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-16 2:29 [KVM-RFC PATCH 0/2] eventfd enhancements for irqfd/iosignalfd Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 2:29 ` [KVM-RFC PATCH 1/2] eventfd: add an explicit srcu based notifier interface Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 14:11 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 14:48 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:54 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 15:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 14:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 15:20 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 15:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 16:17 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 16:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-16 17:01 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 16:38 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-17 17:28 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 17:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-17 19:17 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 19:50 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-17 21:48 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 23:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-18 6:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-18 17:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-18 14:01 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-18 17:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-18 19:04 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-18 22:03 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-18 22:47 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 18:51 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 18:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] eventfd: Allow waiters to be notified about the eventfd file* going away Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 18:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] eventfd: add generalized notifier interface Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 18:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] eventfd: add internal reference counting to fix notifier race conditions Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 19:10 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-19 21:16 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 21:26 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-19 21:49 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 21:54 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-19 22:47 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-20 2:09 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-20 21:17 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-20 22:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-20 23:48 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-21 1:14 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-21 16:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-21 18:39 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-21 23:54 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 16:05 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 17:01 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 17:43 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 18:03 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 18:31 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 18:40 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 18:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 18:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 19:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 19:26 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 19:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 20:06 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 22:53 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-23 1:03 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 1:17 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-23 1:26 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 14:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-23 14:37 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 14:35 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-23 14:42 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 15:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 20:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 19:16 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 19:54 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-24 3:25 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-24 22:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-25 11:42 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-25 16:34 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-25 17:32 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-25 18:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-25 18:41 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-26 11:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23 3:25 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-23 14:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-25 0:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-21 1:05 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2009-06-16 17:54 ` [KVM-RFC PATCH 1/2] eventfd: add an explicit srcu based notifier interface Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 18:09 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 14:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-17 15:02 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 16:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-17 16:41 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:17 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:22 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:40 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-18 9:03 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-18 11:43 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 2:30 ` [KVM-RFC PATCH 2/2] eventfd: add module reference counting support for registered notifiers Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A3D875A.9040101@novell.com \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox