public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	avi@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] eventfd: add internal reference counting to fix notifier race conditions
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:05:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3D875A.9040101@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906201202170.25534@makko.or.mcafeemobile.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6468 bytes --]

Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>   
>>> In the POLLIN event, you schedule_work(&irqfd->inject) and there are no 
>>> races there AFAICS (you basically do not care of anything eventfd memory 
>>> related at all).
>>> For POLLHUP, you do:
>>>
>>> 	spin_lock(irqfd->slock);
>>> 	if (irqfd->wqh)
>>> 		schedule_work(&irqfd->inject);
>>> 	irqfd->wqh = NULL;
>>> 	spin_unlock(irqfd->slock);
>>>
>>> In your work function you notice the POLLHUP condition and take proper 
>>> action (dunno what it is in your case).
>>> In your kvm_irqfd_release() function:
>>>
>>> 	spin_lock(irqfd->slock);
>>> 	if (irqfd->wqh)
>>> 		remove_wait_queue(irqfd->wqh, &irqfd->wait);
>>> 	irqfd->wqh = NULL;
>>> 	spin_unlock(irqfd->slock);
>>>
>>> Any races in there?
>>>   
>>>       
>> Yes, for one you have an ABBA deadlock on the irqfd->slock and wqh->lock
>> (recall wqh has to be locked to fix that other race I mentioned).
>>     
>
> Yep, true. How about we go in little steps?
> How about the one below?
> When you register your poll callback, you get a reference with 
> eventfd_refget().
>   

I was thinking about this last night/this morning and that was
essentially what I was going to propose next as a more palatable+simpler
solution.

> At that point we have no more worries about the eventfd memory (namely 
> "wqh") going away.
> Symmetrically, you use eventfd_refput() once you done with it.
> So we basically de-couple the internal VFS refcount, from the eventfd 
> context memory refcount.
> Where are the non-solveable races on the IRQfd side, of an approach like 
> this one?
>   
None... I think that can work.  The core requirements boil down to: 1)
locking the POLLHUP (as we already discussed), and 2) holding a kref (or
equivelent) to the eventfd_ctx that the client can release once they are
fully out.  After that, it looks like any vanilla wait-queue in the kernel.


>
>
>   
>> Yes, understood.  What I was trying to gently say is that the one-liner
>> proposal alone is still broken afaict.  However, if there is another
>> solution that works that you like better than 133-liner I posted, I am
>> more than willing to help analyze it.  In the end, I only care that this
>> is fixed.
>>     
>
> Is it so?
> What I noticed here, is that you went from "Detailed Mode" (in the emails 
> where you were pushing the new bits), to "Hint Mode" (as below) when it 
> was time to see if there were simpler solutions to the problem.
>   

I wasn't being purposely coy.  It was late friday and I was getting
pressure from the wife to get off the computer ;)  Plus, all the details
were in my patch, so I figured there wasn't a giant need to rehash since
it could just be gleened.  In any case, based on this current reply I
think we are on the same page now.

>   
>> (As a hint, I think I fixed 4-5 races with these patches, so there are a
>> few others still lurking as well)
>>     
>
> Not knowing the details of IRQfd, hinting only is not going to help 
> anything in this case.
>
>
>
> - Davide
>
>
>
> ---
>  fs/eventfd.c            |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/eventfd.h |    6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>   

I haven't had a chance to go over the patch below in detail, but the
30,000 foot view is that it is in line with what I was thinking this
morning.  So, its a preliminary "looks good".  I'll take a closer look ASAP

Thanks Davide,
-Greg

> Index: linux-2.6.mod/fs/eventfd.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.mod.orig/fs/eventfd.c	2009-06-20 13:08:22.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.mod/fs/eventfd.c	2009-06-20 14:00:23.000000000 -0700
> @@ -17,8 +17,10 @@
>  #include <linux/eventfd.h>
>  #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/kref.h>
>  
>  struct eventfd_ctx {
> +	struct kref kref;
>  	wait_queue_head_t wqh;
>  	/*
>  	 * Every time that a write(2) is performed on an eventfd, the
> @@ -59,9 +61,19 @@ int eventfd_signal(struct file *file, in
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eventfd_signal);
>  
> +static void eventfd_free(struct kref *kref)
> +{
> +	struct eventfd_ctx *ctx = container_of(kref, struct eventfd_ctx, kref);
> +
> +	kfree(ctx);
> +}
> +
>  static int eventfd_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
> -	kfree(file->private_data);
> +	struct eventfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
> +
> +	wake_up_poll(&ctx->wqh, POLLHUP);
> +	kref_put(&ctx->kref, eventfd_free);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -201,6 +213,28 @@ struct file *eventfd_fget(int fd)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eventfd_fget);
>  
> +int eventfd_refget(struct file *file)
> +{
> +	struct eventfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
> +
> +	if (file->f_op != &eventfd_fops)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	kref_get(&ctx->kref);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eventfd_refget);
> +
> +int eventfd_refput(struct file *file)
> +{
> +	struct eventfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
> +
> +	if (file->f_op != &eventfd_fops)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	kref_put(&ctx->kref, eventfd_free);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eventfd_refput);
> +
>  SYSCALL_DEFINE2(eventfd2, unsigned int, count, int, flags)
>  {
>  	int fd;
> @@ -217,6 +251,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(eventfd2, unsigned int, 
>  	if (!ctx)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	kref_init(&ctx->kref);
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->wqh);
>  	ctx->count = count;
>  	ctx->flags = flags;
> Index: linux-2.6.mod/include/linux/eventfd.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.mod.orig/include/linux/eventfd.h	2009-06-20 13:08:22.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.mod/include/linux/eventfd.h	2009-06-20 13:59:09.000000000 -0700
> @@ -29,12 +29,18 @@
>  
>  struct file *eventfd_fget(int fd);
>  int eventfd_signal(struct file *file, int n);
> +int eventfd_refget(struct file *file);
> +int eventfd_refput(struct file *file);
>  
>  #else /* CONFIG_EVENTFD */
>  
>  #define eventfd_fget(fd) ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS)
>  static inline int eventfd_signal(struct file *file, int n)
>  { return 0; }
> +static inline int eventfd_refget(struct file *file)
> +{ return -ENOSYS; }
> +static inline int eventfd_refput(struct file *file)
> +{ return -ENOSYS; }
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_EVENTFD */
>  
>   



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 266 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-21  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-16  2:29 [KVM-RFC PATCH 0/2] eventfd enhancements for irqfd/iosignalfd Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16  2:29 ` [KVM-RFC PATCH 1/2] eventfd: add an explicit srcu based notifier interface Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:02   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 14:11     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:38       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 14:48         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:54           ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 15:16             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 14:55           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 15:20             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 15:41               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 16:17                 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 16:19                   ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-16 17:01                     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 16:38                       ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-17 17:28                         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 17:44                           ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-17 19:17                             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 19:50                               ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-17 21:48                                 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 23:21                                   ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-18  6:23                                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-18 17:52                                       ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-18 14:01                                     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-18 17:44                                       ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-18 19:04                                         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-18 22:03                                           ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-18 22:47                                             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 18:51                                             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 18:51                                               ` [PATCH 1/3] eventfd: Allow waiters to be notified about the eventfd file* going away Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 18:51                                               ` [PATCH 2/3] eventfd: add generalized notifier interface Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 18:51                                               ` [PATCH 3/3] eventfd: add internal reference counting to fix notifier race conditions Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 19:10                                                 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-19 21:16                                                   ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 21:26                                                     ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-19 21:49                                                       ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 21:54                                                         ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-19 22:47                                                           ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-20  2:09                                                             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-20 21:17                                                               ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-20 22:11                                                                 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-20 23:48                                                                   ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-21  1:14                                                                     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-21 16:51                                                                       ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-21 18:39                                                                         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-21 23:54                                                                           ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 16:05                                                                             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 17:01                                                                               ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 17:43                                                                                 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 18:03                                                                                   ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 18:31                                                                                     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 18:40                                                                                       ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 18:41                                                                                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 18:51                                                                                       ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 19:05                                                                                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 19:26                                                                                           ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 19:29                                                                                             ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 20:06                                                                                               ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 22:53                                                                                                 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-23  1:03                                                                                                   ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23  1:17                                                                                                     ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-23  1:26                                                                                                       ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 14:29                                                                                                         ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-23 14:37                                                                                                           ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 14:35                                                                                                             ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-23 14:42                                                                                                               ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 15:04                                                                                                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 20:28                                                                                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 19:16                                                                                         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 19:54                                                                                           ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-24  3:25                                                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-24 22:45                                                                                       ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-25 11:42                                                                                         ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-25 16:34                                                                                           ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-25 17:32                                                                                             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-25 18:26                                                                                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-25 18:41                                                                                                 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-26 11:23                                                                                                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23  3:25                                                                             ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-23 14:31                                                                               ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-25  0:19                                                                                 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-21  1:05                                                                 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2009-06-16 17:54                   ` [KVM-RFC PATCH 1/2] eventfd: add an explicit srcu based notifier interface Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-16 18:09                     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 14:45                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-17 15:02                         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-17 16:25                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-17 16:41                             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:17     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:22       ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:40     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16 14:46       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-18  9:03       ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-18 11:43         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-16  2:30 ` [KVM-RFC PATCH 2/2] eventfd: add module reference counting support for registered notifiers Gregory Haskins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A3D875A.9040101@novell.com \
    --to=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox