From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751830AbZFUM4p (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:56:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750997AbZFUM4f (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:56:35 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:33645 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750967AbZFUM4e (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:56:34 -0400 Message-ID: <4A3E2E17.4010305@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:56:55 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregory Haskins CC: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidel@xmailserver.org, mingo@elte.hu, mst@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH 0/4] irqfd fixes/enhancements References: <20090618173534.24119.95115.stgit@dev.haskins.net> In-Reply-To: <20090618173534.24119.95115.stgit@dev.haskins.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/18/2009 08:44 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote: > (Applies to kvm.git/master:c27b64a0) > > The following series represents my queue of fixes for issues in irqfd, > which include enhancements to eventfd. This is a respin of the patches > originally proposed yesterday, called "[KVM-RFC PATCH 0/2] eventfd > enhancements for irqfd/iosignalfd", which you can find a link to the thread > here: > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1091852 > > Aside from introducing a few minor fixes (patches 1/4, 2/4), the general > solution for module reference counting has been extracted from the > (controversial) SRCU enhancement. We can address the SRCU topic at a later > time. For now, fixing the race condition is a higher priority item IMO. > Hopefully, this more focused series is more palatable for the > reviewers/maintainers involved. > Applied 1-2, thanks. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function