public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: asynchronous calls an the lack of --wait-for-completion options (e.g. modprobe, losetup, cryptsetup)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:08:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3F7440.3030603@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac3eb2510906201220v7fc1d51ve4a9937a3d73d3d4@mail.gmail.com>

On 20.06.2009 21:20, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 02:52, Robert Hancock<hancockrwd@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On 06/17/2009 07:39 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
>
>>> The problem is that when I'm e.g. calling modprobe loop, loop might not
>>> has finished it's initialization, when modprobe returns.
>>
>> It will have. Just that udev won't have received the events and created the
>> device node yet. So the solution would likely be on the udev side..
>
> The brutal method to do this is to call:
>    udevadm settle
> after loading the module. It will block until all currently pending
> events for udev are fully handled.
>
> Recent udevadm versions also have a:
>    --exit-if-exists=<filename>
> option, which will make "settle" stop waiting if a given file exists.

Thanks a lot, I already thought it might be udev, but I haven't known 
about udevadm.

Anyway, I still think, that the creation of the device-node is (seen 
from a user-point) part of the module-initialization or part of the 
operation of the userland-tool (like modprobe, losetup or cryptsetup). 
So in my point of view, they should at least offer an option to wait 
until udev finished that operation and should not rely on the user to 
call udevadm.

But I don't want to extend that discussion. I know this is a complex 
subject where many parts are involved and many people are having 
different views (e.g. at boot time such asynchronous completion is often 
wanted).

It would be nice, if at least the userland-tools would document (e.g. in 
there examples-section), that a call to udevadm is necessary before 
going on and using the (should already created) device-node (at least if 
a stable operation on all systems is needed). The problem is, that it 
heavily depends on the system how long udev needs and it might often 
work without a call to udevadm so many people could miss the need to 
call udevadm.

Kind regards,

Alexander Holler

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-22 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-17 13:39 asynchronous calls an the lack of --wait-for-completion options (e.g. modprobe, losetup, cryptsetup) Alexander Holler
2009-06-19  0:52 ` Robert Hancock
2009-06-20 19:20   ` Kay Sievers
2009-06-22 12:08     ` Alexander Holler [this message]
2009-06-23 11:35       ` Kay Sievers
2009-06-23 16:01         ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A3F7440.3030603@ahsoftware.de \
    --to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
    --cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox